X Close

Digital Education team blog

Home

Ideas and reflections from UCL's Digital Education team

Menu

Archive for 2012

BBC Radio 4 – Educational Debates

By Jason R Norton, on 23 August 2012

Image by SummerRain812 via Flickr

If you have got time the educational debates taking place on Wednesday evenings at 8pm on BBC Radio 4 are well worth a listen.

This series of debates is looking at education in the UK from topics on current reform within the secondary school curriculum, discussing why the arts have taken a back seat while more “acceptable” and “assessment” friendly STEM subjects are being pushed to the forefront. Discussion on how the use of technology is changing how students are learning/engaging and with this in mind, what it is that students are actually expecting  to learn while at our institutions.  Does the system in its current form actually meet their expectation or do we need radical change across the whole UK educational arena?

The first debate was last night (Wednesday 23rd August) and can be listened to at the following link http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01m1721

 

The BBC blurb for this first broadcast is as follows:

In the first of three debates to mark the most dramatic reforms in education in decades, John Humphrys asks leading education thinkers what we should teach.

Whether it’s to get to university, to launch a fulfilling career, or to be a useful member of society, what our children learn at school today will profoundly shape their lives, the society we live in and the health of our economy in the 21st Century.

The web gives today’s schoolchildren access to previously unimaginable amounts of knowledge – and yet across Europe there has been social unrest among young people who are angry and terrified that what they know will be meaningless in a future with no jobs.

At home, Government reforms have led to big changes in the national curriculum, increased university fees and parents running their own schools.

Has there ever been a more important time to come back to the fundamental questions of education? In this first programme, leading educationalists including Anthony Seldon, Estelle Morris and Rachel Wolf debate what we should teach.

 

The Second broadcast is on the 29th August BBC Radio 4 at 8:00pm and its official blurb and panel details are as follows.

In programme two, John Humphrys asks a panel including union leader Mary Bousted, cognitive scientist Prof Guy Claxton and inspections expert Roy Blatchford how we should teach.

How should we teach? Why are we obsessed with testing? Are we really exploiting the benefits of the internet and technology? And to what extent can young people teach themselves?

Britain’s education system is going through a period of huge upheaval. A new curriculum comes in next year, the way children are tested is being revamped, and academies and free schools now have new freedoms to teach what and how they want.

The internet means children can access untold amounts of knowledge and new ways of learning – as well as interact with each other and their teachers in ways that were unimaginable just ten years ago. So how are schools and pupils responding to these dramatic advances?

 

Third debate details as currently released

And in the final debate, Shadow Education Secretary Stephen Twigg, Neil O’Brien of Policy Exchange and Prof James Tooley, an expert on private schools for poor children, discuss who should teach.

…………
We would be interested in peoples feedback on these debates and their thoughts on the relevance to UK Higher Education.

Sign up to the eAssessment Scotland Online Conference

By Jessica Gramp, on 17 August 2012

eAssessment Scotland 2012 - Feeding Back, Forming the Future - Day Conference: 31 August, University of Dundee - Online Conference: 23 August - 6 September

As I’m unable to make my usual journey to eAssessment Scotland this year I’m very happy to learn that for the first time they will be delivering an online conference in the weeks surrounding the event. I would strongly encourage anyone interested in learning more about eAssessment to sign up to at least some of the online sessions. They run for between 30 minutes and an hour and there’s 21 to choose from between Thursday 23 August and Thursday 6 September 2012.

Otherwise if you can make the day conference on Friday 31 August 2012, I always find this a very informative and valuable event.

Useful Links:

The University of Dundee, Soffed, the e-Assessment Association, The Higher Education Academy, SQA, eLearning Alliance Scotland

Turnitin’s up and coming features

By Jessica Gramp, on 16 August 2012

Stay up to date with new features on the Turnitin Product Twitter page: http://twitter.com/turnitinproduct

Features in the pipeline for Turnitin include:

  • An Instructor dashboard will soon be available via Moodle – this shows an activity stream, quick links and an overview of assignment submissions
  • See a count of how many times each student has submitted to Turnitin
  • Staff will soon be able to push only those assignments that have been graded to students, without having to show everyone their grades at one time
  • Non-text based assignment submissions that don’t need to be checked for plagiarism will be possible in Turnitin to allow staff to use Grademark to provide feedback
  • URL submissions will enable  students to submit a website, YouTube video or portfolio link to Turnitin for marking

Available late August 2012:

  • Students can retrieve digital receipts from Turnitin, so if the emailed receipt goes missing there is another way to access proof of when they submitted

Coming in January 2013:

  • PeerMark integration with Moodle for peer assessment (Note: UCL doesn’t currently have a PeerMark license)
  • iPad application for offline marking (Windows and Android devices to follow)
New technologies:
  • Turnitin are working with technology that detects changes in the style of writing to flag areas of assignments that may have been ghost written
  • Support for Arabic, and other right to left languages, is being developed
  • Translated plagiarism detection, where Turnitin translates non-English documents into English and then compares this to work submitted by students in English, is also being developed

» Read more about the conference on UCL’s Teaching and Learning Portal

TV pods

By Steve Rowett, on 13 August 2012

Since becoming more involved in learning spaces at UCL, I’ve been finding that inspiration comes from the most unexpected places.

On Saturday night I was down at the BT London Live site in Hyde Park. Between watching Mo Farah run a spectacular double gold and Tom Daley saving his best to last in the diving, I popped into the BT Vision space.

In there were five pods for watching the multitude of olympic channels available. Built by a company in Leeds especially for the BT stand, they were super comfortable and seemed immensely popular. A queue of people waited patiently to get a chance to sit in the pod, with those already in them showing little sign of wanting to leave. I’m sure they’d be equally popular with students too.

I didn’t have my camera with me unfortunately, but did take a couple of pictures with my phone, they’ve not come out great – myriad swirling lights and special effects didn’t help – but you get the idea.

TV Pods at BT London Live, Hyde Park

TV Pods at BT London Live, Hyde Park

A Virtual Learning Environment to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Learning

By uczarda, on 31 July 2012

 Report on Outcomes of E-Learning Development Grant

Overall aims and objectives

The ‘Virtual Learning Environment’ (VLE) project aimed to develop new online tools to facilitate interdisciplinary learning at UCL. The project was particularly aimed at students registered on multidisciplinary Masters courses, such as the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering, run by the Department of Mechanical Engineering. The objectives of the project were guided by the pedagogical principles that knowledge acquisition and learning are facilitated by interaction and collaboration with peers. To achieve this, the Virtual Learning Environment needed to offer a way of enhancing student interaction whilst providing an opportunity for peer-to-peer learning that offered unique motivational and cognitive benefits, whilst also enabling students from different background disciplines to grasp basic concepts.

Methodology – Explanation of what was done and why

Time constraints on a Masters degree course meant it was important to focus the content of the VLE on the fundamental principles necessary for students to grasp key concepts relevant to the course. A VLE was therefore devised to provide online laboratory tutorials (Virtual Laboratory) and an interdisciplinary learning forum (Virtual Journal Club).

(1) Virtual Laboratory: The Virtual Laboratory was based in Moodle and consisted of a portfolio of tutorials introduced throughout the course that were designed to prime the students (primarily from an engineering background) with the working practises of a Life Sciences laboratory. This involved producing learning material that could be loaded into iSpring presentations, which were subsequently converted into Flash format for uploading onto Moodle. Topics covered included aseptic tissue culture techniques, micropipetting, centrifugation, cell counting and enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. The latter two topics included mini quizzes and data analysis tasks. These materials were developed with the assistance of student volunteers who were registered on the MSc course. Their work on the project involved capturing video clips of someone performing the techniques, scripting, dubbing and editing. The students were remunerated for the cost of their time working on the project.

(2) Virtual Journal Club: The Virtual Journal Club (VJC) was established in My Portfolio. After an introductory session to the VJC to show its contents and workings, a different student was invited each week to review the strengths and weaknesses of a paper they had selected from the recent literature relevant to a topic covered in the course module. An online discussion was then opened up to the other members of the group who participated by uploading a brief posting onto the blog.

Project outcomes – Description and examples of what was achieved or produced

The VLE received positive feedback from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course. An Opinio survey was conducted to evaluate the students’ perception of the VLE. These data indicate students generally recognised the benefits of participating in the VLE, despite many of them not having previously used online or virtual learning environments. The VLE received positive feedback from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course. An Opinio survey was conducted to evaluate the students’ perception of the VLE. These data indicate students generally recognised the benefits of participating in the VLE, despite many of them not having previously used online or virtual learning environments.

Opinio survey data from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course:

Virtual Journal Club:

Virtual Laboratory:


From a course lecturer’s perspective, the VLE enabled me to cover more topics during the limited time available. This was particularly evident in the practical sessions where the students were more familiar with the concepts being introduced. Having already been introduced to some of the techniques with the online tutorials they became proficient with the techniques being used much more quickly than groups taught in previous years. An encouraging result from the survey was the students’ impression that the Virtual Journal Club helped them review literature more critically. This skill is an important component for their laboratory based research project and was something that was clearly lacking in previous years.

Evaluation/reflection:

How did the project enhance student learning?

The project enhanced student learning by providing an opportunity for students to be ‘preconditioned’ for certain aspects of the course prior to classroom based activities. An example of this occurred with the viewing of a Virtual Laboratory movie clip explaining aseptic technique, which was followed by the practical session. By enabling the students to be familiar with the techniques that would be used during the laboratory practical session, time was saved allowing students additional time to reflect on what was being covered during the session. The feedback from the Opinio survey generally supported this observation.




How did the outcomes compare with the original aims?

The outcomes of the project were in line with the original aims of the project. A VLE has been created and this has been positively received by the students. The VLE has provided an additional tool for cross disciplinary learning. The students were more enthusiastic about the Virtual Laboratory compared with the Virtual Journal Club. After the first few students had volunteered for the Virtual Journal Club, subsequent volunteers were less forthcoming. To encourage participation a different approach will be adopted for the coming academic year, whereby the participation contributes to 5-10% of the coursework module mark.

How did the project benefit the student workers?

The student workers received training in the production of online teaching aids. They also gained experience in scripting, producing and editing video clips. They also benefitted from financial remuneration on completion of their work.

How has the project developed your awareness, understanding, knowledge, or expertise in elearning?

The project has developed my awareness of the benefits and drawbacks of e-learning. However, the former are greater than the latter and I plan to continue developing this side of the curriculum. The planned peer-to-peer learning that the project aimed for will only be fully achieved if all the students are fully engaged. Therefore participation rates of the Virtual Journal Club will be monitored and reminders sent for each individual’s contribution.

Scalability and sustainability – How will the project continue after the ELDG funding has
discontinued? Might it be expanded to other areas of UCL?

Interest in the Virtual Laboratory and Virtual Journal Club has been expressed by other course coordinators at UCL and it is hoped that similar technology will be rolled-out to a wide range of interdisciplinary courses at UCL. The Opinio survey has revealed areas where the VLE can be enhanced in the future, as shown below.

Dissemination- How will the project outputs of results be disseminated to the department, College or externally?  Are there other departments which would find value in the project outputs or results?

 

Other members of the department are aware of the VLE and have expressed interest in developing similar strategies for other courses. Additional research questions and developmental ideas are going to be explored in the next academic year. It is hoped these data will lead to a journal publication to enable further dissemination outside of UCL.

Moodle 2 features

By Jessica Gramp, on 24 July 2012

Moodle 2 logo (c) Moodle.org

While many of the old features you are used to in Moodle have not changed greatly in Moodle 2 there are some new features you may be interested in…

Some of the new features available in Moodle 2 include:

  • selective release (release activities and resources by date or upon completing other activities)
  • improved Messages area:
    • every message will send an email (by default)
    • easily search for old messages
    • choose when you want to be notified about your own quiz submissions,
  • improved quiz interface
    • flag questions to return to later
    • preview responses before submitting
  • new tabbed course format
  • improved editing
    • drag and drop resources
    • click and point to move blocks

If you want to know more about these features come along to a Moving to Moodle 2 training course.