X Close

Digital Education team blog

Home

Ideas and reflections from UCL's Digital Education team

Menu

Archive for the 'Case Studies' Category

Forward flip

By Clive Young, on 13 June 2013

carl2One of the most surprising (and pleasing) e-learning phenomena at UCL over the last year has been the rapid rise and adoption of the term ‘flipping‘.

Flipping involves an interesting redesign of ‘traditional’ teaching. Students are asked to view and sometimes comment on a short video online to prepare for a tutorial or seminar. The idea is they then come to the live event immediately ready to discuss in more depth the issues raised or apply those ideas in practical problem solving or group work supported by the academic. The videos can be all or part of a recorded lecture or be specially prepared using for example a narrated Powerpoint presentation. They can be supported by many kinds of online resources such as e-readings and quizzes.

Although the idea has been around since at least 2006, used by Eric Mazur at Harvard and others,  the US high school teachers Jon Bergmann and Aaron Sams are often credited with starting the movement. In the UK the idea received a boost in a prophetic 2010 Daily Telegraph article by Daniel Pink on ‘flip thinking’, but it was Salman ‘Kahn Academy’ Khan mentioning “teachers flipping the classroom” in his 2011 TED Talk “Let’s Use Video to Reinvent Education that popularised the whole concept. The influential Wired magazine then accredited flipping as a key trend in an excellent 2012 article University just got flipped: how online video is opening up knowledge to the world which itself forecast the rapid rise of the MOOC.

The idea of getting students to prepare properly for tutorials is hardly new and as the e-learning blogger Steve Wheeler pointed out at the time (What the flip, 2012), there may be risks involved if incomplete flipping perpetuates old ‘instructional’ models. He presented an attractive notion though that “Flipping learning for me means teachers becoming learners and students becoming teachers” which seems the logical ‘next step’ for flipping, an idea I will return to in a later blog post.

One of UCL’s great advocates of flipping is of course Carl Gombrich, Programme Director, Arts and Sciences (BASc) who flipped extensively from the outset of his Approaches to Knowledge course to engage students in cross-disciplinary discussion. Carl explains his approach earlier this academic year in his blog post Flipping lectures – reflections on a term of learning.

Carl also featured in a recent Times Higher Education / Echo 360 webinar E-Learning to Active Learning: Transforming the Learning Environment along with ELE’s Steve Rowett and myself where we explained UCL’s innovative approach The recording can be accessed simply by registering on the site. Carl uses the UCL desktop recording (EchoCapture Personal) software, part of Lecturecast, to create his video segments.

In the presentation Carl highlights some of the ‘good things’ about flipping:

  • Students can interact with lecturers on questions that interest them/problems they want to work through.
  • Students/lecturers get better relationships in terms of mentoring/personal contact etc.
  • Active learning: lecture times can be used for summative assessments: short tests, blog pieces, group work, debates.

As we speak to academic colleagues, E-Learning Champions and departmental committees across UCL we are beginning to realise just how many people are interested in flipping as a way to explore new forms of teaching and learning and the Times Higher Education / Echo 360 webinar is a great place to start.

Using audio and video to enhance learning

By Domi C Sinclair, on 6 February 2013

The JISC RSC ME webinar entitled In Brief: Video and audio for assessment shared some interesting case studies, and technologies that might be useful when using audio and video to enhance learning. Although the title specified assessment, the webinar also covered the use of audio and video for formative learning and feedback.

Review, reflect and assess

Some particular interesting examples include using karaoke to encourage reflection or retention of knowledge by setting students the task of changing the lyrics of a song to reflect a topic. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfDmOg4iayE&list=UUOJyXtr4HCykrNUbCQHUunA

Also the use of dance to get the blood flowing around students bodies (and to their brains0 at the start of a lesson, to replicate concepts and processes, such as those used in bio-mechanics. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ8RXjCYQEA&list=UUOJyXtr4HCykrNUbCQHUunA

This written case study demonstrates how audio can be used to aid the learner in recalling experiences or knowledge. http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk/node/25819

As well as reviewing and reflecting prior to assessment this JISC case study shows how podcasts can be used for assessment, in this case a 10 minute podcast relating to a research essay. http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/42428200/Student%20Produced%20Podcasts%20-%20Assessing%20the%20Pedagogy%20of%20Podcasting

Feedback

There were also some more traditional examples, such as the use of podcasts for quicker feedback. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=add3WyPb27Y&list=UUOJyXtr4HCykrNUbCQHUunA&index=34

A range of reports on feedback using audio and video can be found on the Teacher Training Videos website. http://www.teachertrainingvideos.com/feedback.html

Tools

Voki – a free service that allows students to create speaking avatars. Which can encourage students who would not record themselves on camera to participate. http://www.voki.com/

Xtranormal – a free service that turns text into 3D animated movies. http://www.xtranormal.com/

Coach’s eye – is available as an Android and Apple app for mobile devices. It allows video analysis (including annotations and narration) as well as slow-motion review. http://www.coachseye.com/

Soundcloud – a free audio sharing site, basically put it is the audio equivalent of YouTube. https://soundcloud.com/

A Virtual Learning Environment to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Learning

By uczarda, on 31 July 2012

 Report on Outcomes of E-Learning Development Grant

Overall aims and objectives

The ‘Virtual Learning Environment’ (VLE) project aimed to develop new online tools to facilitate interdisciplinary learning at UCL. The project was particularly aimed at students registered on multidisciplinary Masters courses, such as the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering, run by the Department of Mechanical Engineering. The objectives of the project were guided by the pedagogical principles that knowledge acquisition and learning are facilitated by interaction and collaboration with peers. To achieve this, the Virtual Learning Environment needed to offer a way of enhancing student interaction whilst providing an opportunity for peer-to-peer learning that offered unique motivational and cognitive benefits, whilst also enabling students from different background disciplines to grasp basic concepts.

Methodology – Explanation of what was done and why

Time constraints on a Masters degree course meant it was important to focus the content of the VLE on the fundamental principles necessary for students to grasp key concepts relevant to the course. A VLE was therefore devised to provide online laboratory tutorials (Virtual Laboratory) and an interdisciplinary learning forum (Virtual Journal Club).

(1) Virtual Laboratory: The Virtual Laboratory was based in Moodle and consisted of a portfolio of tutorials introduced throughout the course that were designed to prime the students (primarily from an engineering background) with the working practises of a Life Sciences laboratory. This involved producing learning material that could be loaded into iSpring presentations, which were subsequently converted into Flash format for uploading onto Moodle. Topics covered included aseptic tissue culture techniques, micropipetting, centrifugation, cell counting and enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. The latter two topics included mini quizzes and data analysis tasks. These materials were developed with the assistance of student volunteers who were registered on the MSc course. Their work on the project involved capturing video clips of someone performing the techniques, scripting, dubbing and editing. The students were remunerated for the cost of their time working on the project.

(2) Virtual Journal Club: The Virtual Journal Club (VJC) was established in My Portfolio. After an introductory session to the VJC to show its contents and workings, a different student was invited each week to review the strengths and weaknesses of a paper they had selected from the recent literature relevant to a topic covered in the course module. An online discussion was then opened up to the other members of the group who participated by uploading a brief posting onto the blog.

Project outcomes – Description and examples of what was achieved or produced

The VLE received positive feedback from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course. An Opinio survey was conducted to evaluate the students’ perception of the VLE. These data indicate students generally recognised the benefits of participating in the VLE, despite many of them not having previously used online or virtual learning environments. The VLE received positive feedback from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course. An Opinio survey was conducted to evaluate the students’ perception of the VLE. These data indicate students generally recognised the benefits of participating in the VLE, despite many of them not having previously used online or virtual learning environments.

Opinio survey data from students on the MSc Biomaterials & Tissue Engineering course:

Virtual Journal Club:

Virtual Laboratory:


From a course lecturer’s perspective, the VLE enabled me to cover more topics during the limited time available. This was particularly evident in the practical sessions where the students were more familiar with the concepts being introduced. Having already been introduced to some of the techniques with the online tutorials they became proficient with the techniques being used much more quickly than groups taught in previous years. An encouraging result from the survey was the students’ impression that the Virtual Journal Club helped them review literature more critically. This skill is an important component for their laboratory based research project and was something that was clearly lacking in previous years.

Evaluation/reflection:

How did the project enhance student learning?

The project enhanced student learning by providing an opportunity for students to be ‘preconditioned’ for certain aspects of the course prior to classroom based activities. An example of this occurred with the viewing of a Virtual Laboratory movie clip explaining aseptic technique, which was followed by the practical session. By enabling the students to be familiar with the techniques that would be used during the laboratory practical session, time was saved allowing students additional time to reflect on what was being covered during the session. The feedback from the Opinio survey generally supported this observation.




How did the outcomes compare with the original aims?

The outcomes of the project were in line with the original aims of the project. A VLE has been created and this has been positively received by the students. The VLE has provided an additional tool for cross disciplinary learning. The students were more enthusiastic about the Virtual Laboratory compared with the Virtual Journal Club. After the first few students had volunteered for the Virtual Journal Club, subsequent volunteers were less forthcoming. To encourage participation a different approach will be adopted for the coming academic year, whereby the participation contributes to 5-10% of the coursework module mark.

How did the project benefit the student workers?

The student workers received training in the production of online teaching aids. They also gained experience in scripting, producing and editing video clips. They also benefitted from financial remuneration on completion of their work.

How has the project developed your awareness, understanding, knowledge, or expertise in elearning?

The project has developed my awareness of the benefits and drawbacks of e-learning. However, the former are greater than the latter and I plan to continue developing this side of the curriculum. The planned peer-to-peer learning that the project aimed for will only be fully achieved if all the students are fully engaged. Therefore participation rates of the Virtual Journal Club will be monitored and reminders sent for each individual’s contribution.

Scalability and sustainability – How will the project continue after the ELDG funding has
discontinued? Might it be expanded to other areas of UCL?

Interest in the Virtual Laboratory and Virtual Journal Club has been expressed by other course coordinators at UCL and it is hoped that similar technology will be rolled-out to a wide range of interdisciplinary courses at UCL. The Opinio survey has revealed areas where the VLE can be enhanced in the future, as shown below.

Dissemination- How will the project outputs of results be disseminated to the department, College or externally?  Are there other departments which would find value in the project outputs or results?

 

Other members of the department are aware of the VLE and have expressed interest in developing similar strategies for other courses. Additional research questions and developmental ideas are going to be explored in the next academic year. It is hoped these data will lead to a journal publication to enable further dissemination outside of UCL.