X Close

STS Observatory



Probability of nuclear accidents in a country with 19 nuclear reactors

By Thomas Rose, on 28 March 2011

There are a lot of studies on the probability of accidents in a nuclear power plant. As far as I understand they use methods of risk analysis to calculate the failure probability of the nuclear reactor.
Here I tried a very simple empirical approach: We know the number of nuclear power reactors in the world, we know (probably) the number of severe accidents up to now, so we can calculate the empirical failure probability of a single reactor per year. Thus we are able to calculate the probability that no reactor in the world, in UK or in another country, will have an accident within the next 5, 10 or 20 years.Or that at least on reactor will fail severely. This can be done by using the Poisson distribution.
Up to now there are at least 4 reactor accidents on INES scale 5 or more. Chernobyl (1986) is the only one on level 7, Three Miles Island(1979), Windscale (1957) are on level 5. Also the present Fukushima accident (or accidents?) is level 5, at least at the moment (27.03.2011). On level 5 there are some more accidents and on level 6 is only one, but they were in other nuclear facilities, not in power reactors. One could argue that Windscale was not a civil but a military reactor, but then in Fukushima there is probably more than one reactor involved. So the number of 4 severe accidents seems quite reasonable.
The number of nuclear reactors worldwide increased drastically from 1955 until 1988, from which date the number is nearly constant. Up to the Fukushima accident there were 443 reactors operating worldwide.
By a simple graphical piecewise interpolation of the number of reactors per year a total of 15.000 reactoryears can be estimated. This crude number should be sufficient for the present purpose.
So the probalilty for one severe accident per reactoryear (ry)is
If there are N reactors in operation, the Poisson distribution gives the probability for x severe accidents within the next y years. In order to apply the Poisson distribution the expected mean number of accidents m within this time has to be estimated:
Then the probality to have x accidents when we expect a mean value of m accidents is given by
Thus the probality for no accident is (x=0)
and the probality for at least one accident is
Regarding the worldwide situation for the next 20 years, the number of reactors is 443, we expect an average number of severe accidents
so 2.34 accidents within any period of 20 years somewhere in the world. The probability for one or more severe accidents worldwide is
How is the situation for a single country? We simply have to count the number of reactors within this country and calculate the respective reactoryears.
                                      World        UK               US            D
reactors                       443           19              104           17
reactoryears             8860        380            2080         340
mean # acc                 2.34         0.100       0.549         0.089
p(≥1                              90.36%    9.55%      42.26%       8.59%
On the average more than 2 accidents are expected worldwide, the probality for at least one accident ist 90% worldwide, more than 9% for the UK and more than 40% for the US.
Do you think these estimations are reasonable? Do you think a 9% probability for a Chernobyl or Fukushima accident in the UK within the next 20 years is acceptable?

I am looking forward to your comments.

20 Responses to “Probability of nuclear accidents in a country with 19 nuclear reactors”

  • 1
    RWT wrote on 7 April 2011:

    440+ reactors worldwide, yet the earth’s global ecology is at risk from one single “incident.”

    ~IMHO, the human race is not technologically advanced enough to play God with nuclear energy. Prayers for all the Japanese people. (and all of earths inhabitants)

  • 2
    Nuclear Numbers and Statistics of Disaster wrote on 31 May 2011:

    […] calculated globally, but can also be done for the Indian scenario. Following the methodology given here, the probability of a severe nuclear accident (INES greater than 5) is got by assuming, […]

  • 3
    Dani Tamega wrote on 1 August 2011:

    That is very scary , a 9% probabiity over 20 years for the UK. does that mean a 45% probability over 100 years and a 90% probability over 200 years ?

  • 4
    Ramy Ashour wrote on 6 March 2012:

    I am very poor at maths can someone please answer the question that Dani posed , does this mean a 45% probability over 100 years ?

    Thank you

  • 5
    From Druids, to Biorefineries: Innovation In A Small Nation wrote on 14 March 2012:

    […] Anglesey’s nukes are unlikely, on balance, to be built. Capital costs determine their economic viability and capital is in – well, let’s call it short supply. They nonetheless remain a looming elephant in the region’s room. (Curiously, the only discussions that crop up during my visit concern what to do about roosting bats displaced by site clearance – and the decision to build a third bridge off the island for people to escape if a nuke blows.). […]

  • 6
    Boutique wrote on 30 March 2012:

    These estimations are really scary. When i take the example of Fukushima that has suffered most from nuclear accidents and has undergone enormous damage lately, Japan shall meet all its efforts to put a stop to all that in order to avoid any possible nuclear accidents . The world is still threatened by severe nuclear accidents. .. While hoping that these are only probabilities, and pray that it does not happen.

  • 7
    Ofor Ogbonnaya wrote on 6 May 2012:

    How can it be calculated for a country which intends to build a nuclear reactor in some years to come?

  • 8
    One year on, where is the nuclear debate at? Watch the BBC documentary ‘Children of the Tsunami’ wrote on 18 June 2012:

    […] University College London has a good post examining the statistics of nuclear accidents in countries depending on their numbers of nuclear […]

  • 9
    One year on, where is the nuclear debate at? Watch the BBC documentary ‘Children of the Tsunami’ wrote on 18 June 2012:

    […] University College London has a good post examining the statistics of nuclear accidents in countries depending on their numbers of nuclear […]

  • 10
    Isabelle Gonzalez wrote on 30 June 2012:

    These statics are telling that human define there end.These plant are in developed country so if these nuclear power reactors have any problem 50%- 70% of the part will explode and as I know rest part of the world is already suffering from food inefficiency.I my suggestion people have to find other solution or make something that control these nuclear power reactors in any case.

  • 11
    ELLA TAYLOR wrote on 1 July 2012:

    As the states “a 9% probabiity over 20 years for the UK. does that mean a 45% probability over 100 years”.
    If it is correct what about for the US. Does that mean a 210% probability over 100 years? As a 42% probabiity over 20 years for the US. Please correct me if i am wrong.

  • 12
    Wilson wrote on 20 July 2012:

    I am very poor in maths but,I really worried after reading this post. Is there any way to avoid the accident? If world is in danger for this nuclear reactor, how government can seat idealy?

  • 13
    Isaac wrote on 28 July 2012:

    I am so scared after reading these figures. I have also read some where about nuclear meltdown that If a single nuclear meltdown were to occur in Western Europe, around 28 million people on average would be affected by contamination of more than 40 kilobecquerels per square meter. This figure is even higher in southern Asia, due to the dense populations. A major nuclear accident there would affect around 34 million people, while in the eastern USA and in East Asia this would be 14 to 21 million people.

  • 14
    Stewart wrote on 22 August 2012:

    There is a lot of maths you used here and I don’t like maths. But I can say these things are very scary and we should do something in this matter and we should be prepared for these kind of accidents and these accidents can be big disasters so just be prepared.

  • 15
    Hannah wrote on 7 September 2012:

    Definitely these statistics are scary and these kind of things are very dangerous but tell me can anyone live without electricity now days? Can anyone live without phones now days? Can anyone travel hundreds and thousands of miles by foot?
    Now days we all are habitual of these luxurious things and can’t live without them and all of these need power to work. As everyone know there are very few power sources available so we need some alternatives and nuclear power plants are very good example of these alternatives. I know there is a big risk associated with it but I heard people die slipping in bathroom that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t go to bathroom. It means that we need some extra precautions and safty.

  • 16
    blaqswans | cygnes noirs wrote on 9 March 2013:

    […] The University College London has a good piece examining the statistics of nuclear accidents in countries depending on their numbers of nuclear reactors. It is a really good introduction to the difficulties of probabilities in stochastic systems and it concludes that in a world of 443 reactors (19 in the UK, 58 in France and 104 in the US) we can expect 2.34 accidents within any period of 20 years somewhere in the world. The probability for one or more severe accidents worldwide is 90.36%. Brought back to a single country, the calculation concludes that there is a 9% probability for a Chernobyl or Fukushima accident in the UK within the next 20 years… […]

  • 17
    lawyer criminal wrote on 1 June 2014:

    It is perfect time to make some plans for the
    future and it is time to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I could
    I wish to suggest you some interesting things or suggestions.
    Maybe you could write next articles referring to this article.

    I desire to read more things about it!

  • 18
    ecoexuma.com wrote on 9 August 2014:

    These machines were really made for incline walking more than anything else.
    Review sites are great for finding out what an e book is about and how others who have
    read the book feel about it. So are they really effective or not’
    I will try to dissect this subject with my fair and unbiased Jumpsoles review.

  • 19
    Melanie Dahlheimer wrote on 9 October 2014:

    good article, thanks.

  • 20
    Toptan fotokopi kağıdı wrote on 23 November 2015:

    A4 fotokopi kağıdının fiyatlarını etkileyen faktörlerin başında kalitesi gelmektedir, kalite belirlenirken gramaj,selülöz yapısı,beyazlık,kesim kalitesi,pürüzlülük dikkate alınmaktadır. En ucuz a4 fotokopi kağıdı satın aldığınızda beklentilerinizin çoğunu karşılamadığı gibi kullanım esnasında sorunlarla karşılaşmanıza neden olur. Özellikle 80 gr/m2 gramajından düşük kağıtlar yazıcıda sıkışmalara sebep olmaktadır,ayrıca laser kesim yapılmamış ürünlerde kenarlarda oluşan çapaklar drumın gereğinden hızlı şekilde yıpranmasına neden olur. Giyotin ile kesim yapıldığına çıkan tozlar yazıcı içerisinde gereksiz kirliliğe neden olurlar. Kaliteli a4 fotokopi kağıdı ithalatı yapan firmaların ithal ettikleri markalar,rakiplerine göre biraz pahalı olsada kullanım esnasında fire vermeden kullanılır. Toptan a4 fotokopi kağıdı alımlarında özellikleri iyi incelenmeli,en azından bir paketi kullanılarak toptan siparişi sonra verilmelidir. Dikkat edilmesi gereken hususlardan biride paket üzerinde gramajın yazılı olmasıdır,özellikle ucuz satılan ürünlerin gramajı düşük olduğundan üzerinde gramaj yazmaz. Nakliye ve depolama işlemi oldukça zor olduğundan satın aldığınız ürünlerin size ulaşmadan önceki depolanma koşulları çok önemlidir,güvenilir markaların ürünleri dahi bulundukları yerde direkt güneş ışığına yada rutubete maruz kalmışsa kullanımda sorunlarla karşılaşmanıza neden olabilir. Özellikle arkalı önlü çekimlerde kullanılacaksa kağıt özellikleri çok daha önemli hale gelmektedir,ısıtıcı merdaneden geçerken deforme olacaklarından,arka yüzeyin basımı esnasında takılma ihtimali çok daha yüksektir.Sebebi bilinmese de kullanıcıların nerede ise tamamının fiyat takıntısı olduğundan kaliteli güvenli,sorunsuz garantili ürünler yerine en ucuz olanların arandığı günümüzde,gerek ithalatçılar,gerek toptancılar,gerekse perakende satış yapan kırtasiyeciler yalnızca fiyatlarla ilgilenerek en iyi fiyata a4 fotokopi kağıdı satmaya çalışmaktadırlar. İş yerlerinin en küçük harcama kalemi olmasına rağmen,en ucuza nereden satın alırım,en ucuza nereden bulurum araştırmasında ilk sıralarda gelmektedir. Hareketli bir iş yerinin dahi aylık kullanımının bir koliyi aşmadığı düşünüldüğünde kaliteyi seçenlerin aylık kaç para fazla harcadığını hesaplamak zor olmayacaktır. Fotokopi kağıdı üreticileri çok fazla olmasa da markaları oldukça çoktur, bunun nedeni firmaların kendi markalarıyla rekabet edecek başka markalar yaratmasıdır. A4 fotokopi kağıdı ithalatçıları da yurt dışından tek bir firmadan ürün ithal etmelerine karşılık, sattıkları marka adedi çok daha fazladır. A4 fotokopi kağıdı toptancıları ve ithalatçılarının dikkat ettikleri önemli hususlardan birisi kaliteli malzeme arayan müşterileri için yüksek kalite standartlarına sahip bir markayı ürün yelpazeleri içine koyarken, en ucuz fiyatları olan ürünlerle rekabet etmek için, sıradan düşük kaliteli ürünleri ithal etmeleri veya stoklarında bulundurmalarıdır. A4 kağıt boyutları birbiriyle aynı olmakla beraber, gramaj ve kalite özellikleri nedeni ile fiyatlarında farklılık göstermektedir. 80 gram fotokopi kağıdı kdv oranı % 8 olmakla beraber, kalite sınıflandırmasında kdv oranları değişmez. Acil siparişlerinizin hızlı şekilde ulaştırılması için satıcı firmaların ne kadar harcadıklarını düşünmek bile istemezsiniz. Kargo ücretinin dahi ana parayı geçtiği ofislerin vazgeçilmezi ürünün en iyisini,en iyi fiyata,en hızlı şekilde tedarik edebileceğiniz firmamız İstanbul anadolu yakasındaki müşterilerimizin acil a4 fotokopi kağıdı ihtiyaçlarını,hızlı servis sistemimizle ücretsiz olarak çözmektedir. Sabah ve öğlen olmak üzere ücretsiz servis araçlarımız günde iki kez anadolu yakasındaki müşterilerimize aynı gün kapıya teslim avantajıyla hizmet vermektedir. Teknik şartnamelerin ön gördüğü en kaliteli ürünleri en ucuz fiyatlarla satmayı hedefleyen firmamızın bu konudaki en önemli avantajı, nakit alım yapmasıdır. Spot fiyatlarla tedarik ettiği ürünleri, en düşük kar marjıyla satıyor olmamız müşterilerimizin üstün nitelikli ürünlere, sıradan ürünlerle aynı fiyatları ödeyerek sahip olmasını sağlamaktadır.

    toptan fotokopi kağıdı

Leave a Reply