A blog post for all those interested in Student Engagement and Inclusion in Higher Education

By Elisa Valentin

A few months ago, I received an open call to join a reflective research project on students’ perceptions of generative AI in education led by UCL Arena researcher Jesper Hansen and Faculty Learning Technology Lead (UCL A&H) Abbi Shaw. Having mulled over that question throughout my master’s, I jumped at the opportunity to reflect on my own and hear about other students’ experiences. Fast-forward to September, I had the honour of sharing my experience as a participant in this project alongside Selin Abdik (see her blog about her experiences) at the RAISE (Researching, Advancing & Inspiring Student Engagement) conference in Leicester. This blog post is a reflection on this experience.

Over the course of my studies, I have encountered numerous ways of questioning systems of power and how to act within them. The RAISE Conference was one such space where I got to hear from those researching and working to advance inclusion and student engagement in Higher Education. Hearing from a mix of student engagement leads, faculty leads, student union officers, activists, and students like me felt like sharing perceptions of what the ‘elephant’ looks like, except that, unlike the parable of the six blind men, we were actually united by the commitment to improving student engagement and inclusion.

Placing Care at the Heart of Education

Dr. Iwi Ugiagbe’s keynote set the stage for this year’s topic on Equity in Attainment and Student Success. With the pandemic and the cost-of-living crisis as background, the racial and ethnic achievement gap is increasing. In parallel, students’ expectations of and engagement in higher education have changed. Not only this, the challenges that higher education institutions face regarding student engagement differ based on their unique geographical and institutional context and their student body.

Among the topics raised were the need to adapt learning spaces, focus on delivering quality teaching, and mediate the external factors affecting attendance and achievement, such as costs of living, commuting, and caring responsibilities. This was all part of a broader reflection on what ‘education for the 21st century’ and the ‘post-covid’ model should look like. Presenters and participants did not shy away from relating this to structural inequalities and injustices. Through these discussions, it became clear how the questions of student engagement and achievement are intimately connected to questions of care.

A clear message I left the conference with was the need more than ever to place care at the centre of educational approaches and redefine ‘student success’ in academic and professional terms. To do so, we must start by seeking and hearing students’ voices to inform solutions and co-creation and involve them in improving and solving the diverse issues that concern them. This does not mean putting the onus solely on students to do this work. The RAISE Conference had some good examples of how student-led or student-staff collaboration gives centre stage to the voices it aims to empower.

The Power of Student Voice

From initially contributing as a research participant to co-presenting alongside Abbi and Jesper and attending the conference, it was powerful and validating to feel that people looked positively upon Selin and my input and even sought it. Equally powerful and a source of pride was witnessing fellow students being vocal about their experiences and sharing their projects at the conference.

The MedRACE Project left a notable impression on me as an example of what student voices coming together and receiving an attentive ear can achieve. Presented by medical students from the University of Leicester, MedRACE is a great example of a successful student-staff partnership that has grown over the years, working to foster equality in the medical curriculum and address racial harassment.

In the words of one of the student presenters: ‘We’re at the forefront of experiences, so we can highlight issues to staff.’ This encapsulates the need for student voice. Who else is better than the primary concerned to know what is needed for our education experience? Nonetheless, as the students repeatedly stated: ‘We could not have achieved all this without the help of our staff’.

Methods that Bring Value

Any project or initiative that seeks to improve the conditions of students should therefore strive to have them take an active voice on the issues that concern them. The question, then, is how to reach students when they are not engaging as much?

Effectively engaging students (or any target group) requires them to feel that there are benefits to getting involved.

Drawing on their experiences of doing anti-racism work in sports societies, doctoral researchers Rhianna Garret and Iman Khan made the case for the value of student-led advocacy in developing valuable skills for employability. Starting from the observation that ‘it’s really hard to do critical thinking and problem-solving out of context’, their point is that students can pick up valuable transferable skills from getting involved in issues they care about. Crucially, these advocacy initiatives must be institutionally backed and connected to an employability approach to yield such benefits.

The presentation highlighted the need to see students as agents rather than passive beneficiaries and, as a consequence, the need to also hold them accountable. Connected to this is the idea that students should be taught that they can and should be compensated for their work, notably when this generates an emotional or psychological cost.

Another way to encourage student engagement is through adopting research and data collection methods that bring value to the participants themselves. While surveys and questionnaires have their place to gather input, they can provide a thin understanding of a phenomenon. This can feel especially frustrating when grappling with questions of student satisfaction and expectations as a module leader, programme director or at the faculty level. On students’ end, this kind of practice can often feel extractive, of little value, or perceived as unlikely to achieve much change.

This brings me to my last point, which was the object of my participation in Abbi and Jesper’s research. As a student and former academic representative, I can speak from personal experience about the value of creating spaces to exchange with staff and faculty on topics that are relevant to me and to the broader student body.

For certain ‘controversial’ topics, such as the use and perceptions of AI, disconnecting these spaces from the academics that teach and assess you on a daily basis increases trust. Equally, using alternative methods of inquiry, such as reflective research, co-creation or ‘embodied’ methodologies, can be perceived as more enriching by participants as it is an opportunity to gain insights on a topic relevant to their life and contribute to shaping the debate.

Final Thoughts

Through this experience, I developed a greater understanding of the power of the ‘student voice’ and the impact we can have as students on people in the room, probably beyond what was anticipated! Of course, this requires being (en)able(d) to make it into the room in the first place. The key is, therefore, to create spaces and opportunities for students to share their thoughts and get involved with issues that they care about in a way that can benefit them personally and professionally. Students must be given opportunities to join these spaces and be vocal about their need for them. This requires dedicating adequate resources to creating these spaces and exchanges.

Here are three takeaways I invite you to consider:

• We should approach issues of engagement and inclusion from a perspective and pedagogy of care.
• To increase student engagement and inclusion, seek initiatives and methods that bring value to all involved. Practices that invite reflection and contribute to an experience that participants might value intrinsically are especially interesting.
• To my student peers, your voices and experiences matter, let them be heard

As a recent UCL IOE graduate in Educational Planning, Economics and International Development, I am passionate about researching education equity, its connections to the ‘poly-crisis’, and what achieving quality education might look like depending on each context. A legacy of my Arts and Sciences (BASc) studies, I enjoy applying my ‘research imagination’ to investigate interdisciplinary issues. 

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/elisa-valentin/?locale=en_US

RAISE 2025 will be happening on September 4-5 September at the University of Glasgow.

How can Lecturers ensure that they create an inclusive environment where all students can thrive and enjoy an optimal sense of belonging? Why are some students less inclined to participate in in-class discussions than others? Are we doing enough to diversify the curriculum? Are we adopting a truly intersectional approach when we implement new teaching and assessment methods? Why is attendance not what it used to be?

UCL’s Arts & Humanities Faculty boasts a myriad of successful and effective EDI initiatives, yet these questions kept popping into my mind following meetings with personal tutees and candid conversations with students. Indeed, it was as part of the “Reverse Mentoring in SELCS” programme that my own student mentor first mentioned the issue of socio-economic equity, and our sessions brought to the forefront something that should be self-evident but that many of us hadn’t really paid attention to: that not all students arrive in UCL with the same financial, social and cultural capital. Whilst this is especially true for First-Year students, these differences are also pervasive in every degree year. Students who have attended private schools with lower student-to-teacher ratios, who have benefitted from private tutoring, who are well-travelled and who regularly attend cultural events are more likely to participate in class and to show higher levels of confidence. This is particularly pertinent in the Arts and Humanities, where in-class discussions often prompt students to share their personal experiences and preferences with regard to travels, performances or exhibitions.

A collage of our socio-economic equity interviews.I discussed this with my colleague Macarena Jiménez Naranjo, who had also taken part in the same reverse mentoring programme and who incidentally had received similar comments from her own student mentor. In fact, it became clear that so many of our students had discreetly hinted at the issue of socio-economic inequalities, and how these shaped their learning and campus experience. Furthermore, as an Access UCL personal tutor who has worked closely with this cohort for the past two years, students have often confided in me how in particular a lack of cultural capital exacerbates their impostor syndrome and limits their ability to perform inside and outside the classroom.

Macarena and I felt it was time to discuss the socio-economic dimension openly. We already worked together to produce an A&H EDI Dialogues podcast, an experience we really enjoyed. We therefore decided to host and record a series of three podcasts under the umbrella topic of socio-economic equity and education. Each podcast would involve the two of us as presenters and two students who would discuss a particular aspect of this overarching topic. We knew we wanted to create a safe environment where students could safely hone their speaking and analytical skills, boost their critical thinking and gain confidence. Also, in line with the decolonising the curriculum format, students should be responsible for designing the podcasts.

With the support of the Centre for Humanities Education, we invited six Arts and Humanities students to cover three main topics. Anna Duongova and Isaac Timberlake focused on intersectionality and reverse snobbery, highlighting how appearances can deceive. James Cooper and Victoria Wysocka discussed class issues on campus, including commuting and social opportunities. Natalie Calderon and Tatum Kemsley’s conversation centred around the Year Abroad, which, although no doubt exciting and enriching, can also pose a set of socio-economic issues.

The very stimulating conversations allowed students to provide insights and convey suggestions on how to make our lectures more inclusive in terms of socio-economic factors. It was also heartwarming to see how it built a greater understanding between all of us – people from different generations, origins and backgrounds. Above all, the students’ candid revelations and pertinent recommendations are already shaping our strategy – as Lecturers, as researchers and as personal tutees. We invite you to listen to the full series, which indeed challenges assumptions and calls for deeper thinking about the delivery of courses and institutional practices by bringing socio-economic issues on campus to the forefront. In the meantime, here are our top tips:

• Don’t judge a book by its cover. Reverse snobbery is real, and it is damaging. Living off campus and/or having to miss out on expensive social activities can also exacerbate students’ feelings of loneliness – encourage your students to attend free or low-cost activities.
• Commuting is expensive! It can also be exhausting. It can affect students’ attendance, performance, and in-class participation. The same applies to part-time jobs. Whenever possible, try to help make their workload more manageable.
• If your students have a Year Abroad, acknowledge that whilst this really is an exciting opportunity for all of them, the logistics can be challenging for students with caring responsibilities or those from lower economic backgrounds without financial support.

Interested in continuing the conversation or looking to collaborate with us on similar initiatives? Please contact us via m.oaknin@ucl.ac.uk and m.naranjo@ucl.ac.uk.

….

The UCL Centre for Humanities Education is funded by generous support from The Lord Randolph Quirk Endowment Fund at UCL. EDI Dialogues were made possible through the support of The Lord Randolph Quirk Endowment Fund.

Macarena Jiménez Naranjo, PhD, is a Lecturer (Teaching) in Spanish Language and Hispanic Literature at University College London. Her interests include Teaching Spanish as a Foreign Language (ELE), language varieties, and curriculum decolonisation. She currently coordinates the Special Interest Group on Decolonising Spanish Language Teaching ELEUK (SIG-Des-ELEUK).

Mazal Oaknín is Associate Professor (Teaching) in Spanish Language and Literature and Gender Studies and Spanish Language Coordinator. Her publications include the monograph Feminism, Writing and the Media in Spain (Peter Lang, 2019), and the co-edited volumes Literatura política y política literaria en España: Del Desastre del 98 a Felipe VI (Peter Lang, 2015), and Inclusion, Diversity and Innovation in Translation Education (UCL Press, 2024). Her present research interests centre around EDI in Spanish language teaching and translation education.  Mazal is Co-Director of the e-Expert Seminar Series in Translation and Modern Language Teaching and is on the Editorial Board of the Journal of Translation Studies. Since 2022 Mazal has also launched a number of EDI projects, including the “Tackling the BAME-BIPOC Awarding Gap in SELCS”, “Decolonising Gender Studies Through Reverse Mentoring”, “Reverse Mentoring in SELCS”, and “Mi Salud Mental: Using Curriculum-Infusion to Promote Positive Mental Health and Wellbeing”. Mazal is also a Co-Chair of UCL’s Gender Equality Steering Group.

In May 2024, an email popped into my inbox that would unexpectedly lead to a great academic experience: presenting at a national conference on student engagement. In the email from Abbi Shaw and Jesper Hansen, they were looking for students to take part in their research about how Arts and Humanities students engage with and think about AI. As an undergraduate Arts and Sciences student with an interest in artificial intelligence, faculty research being conducted about our perceptions of AI as students intrigued me, so I expressed my interest in being a part of this research. Fast forward to September, I was a student co-presenter at the 2024 RAISE (Researching, Advancing & Inspiring Student Engagement) Conference at the University of Leicester.

After expressing my interest in participating in the research, we were tasked with writing a series of reflections on five key questions and then joining a focus group to discuss them with other students. The questions were not just technical—they asked us to reflect on our personal relationships with AI, from the role it plays in our academic work to how we see it shaping our future careers. The questions were designed to enable us to dig deep into our feelings about generative AI, with questions about what reflections the term ‘generative AI’ triggers, or about how AI shows up in our daily life, or even in our studies at UCL. The introspective nature of the questions made me want to answer them and hear about what the other participants said.

A few months later, I received an exciting email from Abbi and Jesper about another opportunity: to be a student co-presenter at the RAISE Conference at the University of Leicester. If you have never heard of RAISE, it is a conference that focuses on research around student engagement, with themes like accessibility, equity, and celebrating diversity. This year’s theme was “Equity in Attainment & Student Success,” which was very fitting with the nature of our participation in this research. The purpose was to amplify student voices and make them part of the broader academic conversation. At the time, I did not know what the conference was about or what to expect from presenting, but I wanted to give it a go. So, Elisa Valentin (who has also written a blog on her experiences) and I joined the team as student co-presenters and had the chance to extend our participation.

Our presentation at RAISE focused on UCL’s ongoing efforts to incorporate a wide range of perspectives—from both staff and students—into the research process. Elisa and I shared our experiences of participating in faculty-led research, talking about how meaningful it was to be seen not just as participants, but as active contributors to the project.

Standing up there as a co-presenter, I realised that this kind of student engagement—where our insights are valued on an equal footing with those of staff—is exactly what conferences like RAISE are all about, and it fits into this broader discussion of co-creation. Co-creation was indeed a recurring theme throughout the conference, and it became clear that involving students in shaping their own learning is not just beneficial—it is necessary. Whether it is redesigning assessments, building inclusive learning environments, or making decisions about course content, there was a strong push for universities to break down traditional hierarchies and engage students as equal partners.

At the conference, there were people from various universities, all with different experiences and backgrounds, who gathered to discuss how we can reshape higher education. One of the parallel sessions that stood out to me was the one about “Why are students not attending in-person classes post-COVID-19?” by Conor Naughton (Education and Student Experience Manager at the University of Nottingham), Tom Lowe (Assistant Head of School (Student Experience), School of Finance and Accounting at the University of Westminster), and Tania Struetzel (Director of Student Success at Southampton Solent University). This session, delivered as an interactive workshop, explored the students’ perceptions of the necessity of in-person attendance after the pandemic. The majority of the room was academic staff members, and as a student, it was interesting to hear the academic staff discuss what they think the reasons for students’ low attendance to in-person classes might be.

As I listened to the discussions on post-COVID attendance, I realized just how complex student engagement is. While many staff members pointed to flexibility and convenience as factors, I found myself thinking about the importance of mental health, diverse learning preferences, and the need for universities to adapt. It was reassuring to see that the conversation was not about ‘blaming’ students for lower attendance, but about rethinking how we deliver education in a way that truly meets the needs of today’s learners.

This whole experience left me with a deeper understanding of equity in education, and how essential it is for students to be included in the shaping of our academic environments. It was pleasant to see so many educators and students working together to reimagine what inclusive education looks like. From being involved in the research to presenting at the RAISE Conference, this experience has shown me that students have a pivotal role to play in shaping not only our own learning journeys but also the broader academic landscape.

Author Bio: Selin Abdik is a second-year BASc Arts and Sciences student at UCL, specialising in the interdisciplinary application of technology. Selin has a strong interest in how technology can drive innovation and create impactful change across various fields. As a co-presenter at the 2024 RAISE Conference, Selin contributed insights on student involvement in research and policy changes within higher education. You can find out more about Selin’s work via Linkedin.

This project was supported by funding from UCL’s Centre for Humanities Education. The author wished to express their thanks to UCL CHE and the Randolph Quirk Endowment.

RAISE 2025 will be happening on September 4-5 September at the University of Glasgow.

Hi Elettra – many congratulations on receiving the Faculty Education Award for enhancing belonging! Can you tell us a bit more about your work as Widening Participation and Outreach Tutor for the School of European Languages, Culture and Society (SELCS)?

I was Widening Participation (WP) and Outreach Tutor for SELCS from 2019 to 2023 but have worked with WP since 2016. I started by teaching a session on Italian and Norwegian for the first Y12 Residential Language and Culture Summer School run by SELCS and then ended up coordinating it the year after. I have never looked back, and WP continues to be a big part of what I do as I am still heavily involved in our Language and Culture Taster Days and Summer Schools.

Since 2017, I have aimed to design a comprehensive WP strategy that today involves colleagues across UCL and engages with a wide range of schools, pupils and teachers. Thanks to the generous support of UCL Access and WP and many UCL colleagues, I began constructing a dedicated online platform which features information about WP activities and initiatives and a library of online resources. Our yearly activities have so far included running the Y12 WP Residential Language and Culture Summer School, contributing to the Routes into Language Schools and managing a scheme called Near Peers – designed and coordinated by Terry King – which provides a platform for UCL language undergraduates to mentor school students of languages online. In 2023, I also created a programme of Language and Culture Taster Days for Y6 to Y12. This has been a great way to establish contacts with different schools: we have welcomed 50-60 pupils per taster day by dividing them into four groups and rotating them across four different activities. These include a session on why and how we study foreign languages, a visit to the exhibition ‘Not Just Words: Learning Languages through Objects and Art’, a surprise language taster and a campus tour.

During the pandemic, I also focused on providing teachers and learners with free online resources promoting innovative approaches to foreign language learning and multilingualism. These include our ‘A Language is Not Just Words’ series, which I coordinated with my colleague Christine Sas (Associate Professor in Dutch and WP and Outreach Tutor for SELCS since 2023). I highly recommend checking out these resources which so many colleagues worked on – the multilingual songs were so much fun to make!

The second series was ‘The Language and Culture Show and Tell’ series. This consists of language tasters and related materials created around objects from UCL Art Collections. This was also the basis of the above-mentioned UCL Art Museum exhibition, ‘Not Just Words’.

You’re also the academic lead and creator for the exhibition ‘Not Just Words: Learning Languages through Arts and Objects’, which promotes innovative object-based approaches to language education! Please tell us a little bit more about this exhibition and how the idea for it came about.

As I mentioned, ‘Not Just Words’’ was born out of the Language and Culture Show and Tell series, a collaboration between a group of language specialists at UCL and UCL Art Museum. The exhibition (or showcase, as my colleagues and I prefer to call it), which I co-curated with Dr Andrea Fredericksen (Curator, UCL Art Museum), opened in January 2023. It initially featured 13 short language taster videos, which take artworks from UCL’s Collection as their starting point while encouraging visitors to learn some of the basics in several languages. The aim is to showcase the benefits of this innovative object-based or, more specifically, collection-based approach to language teaching, which demonstrates that language is not just words by emphasising the connection between language and culture.

I think the showcase has shown how a collection-based approach to language teaching can successfully promote both the importance of language awareness and the relevance of university collections to academic and non-academic audiences. I was thrilled to see how the showcase encouraged more tutors (across UCL and beyond) to create similar collection-based tasters as Ancient Greek, Faroese, Hebrew and Romanian joined the series in 2023 and 2024. In fact, three more tasters which significantly expand the series’s scope (and which were generously supported by the Centre for Humanities Education) are in development now, so watch this space!

How do the objects or artworks in this exhibition impact its visitors? Have there been any particular responses sparked by this exhibition that you’d like to share? 

In this exhibition, the objects very much take centre stage. They are what visitors see even before they engage with the video tasters on the iPads. My colleague Andrea often calls the objects ‘conversation starters’ and I really like this expression. They are the starting point of the conversations we have had with colleagues who created the tasters and of the narratives developed in the videos. They have also been the source of many interesting conversations with different visitors. The focus on the object is why I am so keen to emphasise that the video series is called ‘Show and Tell’. As I often explain to the school groups that visit us, the ‘show and tell’ methodology – which they are all familiar with from Early Years settings and Primary school – offers many opportunities and allows learners to take control of their learning. It is also not dissimilar from what we call Object-based Learning (OBL), a methodology UCL colleagues have developed extensively in recent years.

While the videos are generally suitable for visitors from 15-18 years of age upwards, the objects themselves allow us to engage even younger audiences. The enthusiastic response we had from a group of Y3s (aged 7-8) when we organised a language treasure hunt in the museum will remain one of the highlights of the exhibition.

How did you grow interested in museums as a site of learning? What role do they continue to play in education?  

A bit by chance really… Museums, OBL and, more specifically, collection-based teaching are now central to my teaching, but it all started when I attended a drop-in session at UCL Art Museum in 2015. There I met Andrea and Dr Nicholas Grindle (Lecturer (Teaching) Education and Practice Development) at the Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching (now UCL Arena). They were trying to encourage more staff members to use UCL Collections in their teaching and UCL Art Museum as a teaching space. Following this session, together with then Danish language tutor Dr Jesper Hansen (who today is Associate Professor (Teaching) and Programme Director for Arena for Lecturers on Probation at UCL Arena), I began to pilot a new teaching approach to a series of joint Danish and Norwegian language classes that took place in UCL Art Museum and introduced collections-based teaching as a language learning methodology in Scandinavian Studies curriculum. Today, I try to include collection-based sessions in my teaching whenever I can: in my language sessions, literature and cultural studies sessions and public engagement and knowledge transfer events.

Can you tell us more about the language tasters you have developed, and how you view their role in making language learning more accessible to students?

Given that UCL offers the widest range of language-based degrees in the UK, the Language and Culture Show and Tell series showcases as many languages and objects in our collections as possible. We began by focusing on the foreign languages we offer at UCL while exploring objects from our UCL Art Collection but then expanded our scope to languages beyond UCL (like Faroese) and a broader range of UCL collections (like Special Collections and the Petrie Collections). For each language, the tutor produced a short video which takes an object from the UCL Collections as its starting point. Some also include a worksheet based on the video’s content.

By using objects from UCL’s Art Collections as their starting point, the language tasters digitally recreate the experience of learning through objects in museum spaces, making our collections and approach to learning as accessible as possible. As I mentioned earlier, these materials were originally designed with students in Y10-Y12 in mind. This means that, while they were created within a research-intensive university environment, they are tailored to be accessible to a much broader audience. The tasters, which are freely available online, thus allow learners to access them from their own devices, presuppose no previous knowledge and are accompanied by a full transcript.

In what ways has your research informed your teaching, and vice-versa?

My teaching projects with UCL’s collections have entirely changed the course of my research. Ever since Professor Dilly Fung outlined the UCL Connected Curriculum in her book A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education (2017), research-based learning has become a core principle behind UCL’s educational framework. As outlined in Fung’s book, student learning ‘should reflect the kinds of active, critical and analytical enquiry undertaken by researchers’. creating connections ‘across subjects and out into the world’, ‘connecting academic learning with workplace learning’, ‘producing outputs directed at an audience’ and ‘connecting with each other’ (Fung 2017, 5, 20). Working with OBL and Collections is a great way of introducing these key principles in our teaching and informing our research. At the moment, I see most of my research as an example of ‘teaching-based research’, namely research that comes directly out of exploring new teaching practices.

The collection-based Scandinavian Studies teaching project I carried out in 2016 provided the first fragments for my research while encouraging me to embrace a different approach to research, one that ultimately takes its starting point from serendipity. As I unearthed new materials these were included in my research but also fed back into my teaching. In 2021 I launched the online exhibition Nordic Fragments, where historical items from UCL Collections are combined with modern-day digital objects to explore stories of UK-Nordic connections from the nineteenth century onward. In addition to articles that analyse the impact of a collection-based approach to teaching, I am also finishing a monograph: British Representations of Modern Scandinavia: An Object-based Investigation (to be published by UCL Press). In this book, I explore the cultural contacts between the UK and Scandinavia, taking as a starting point selected items from UCL Collections. Divided into three sections (landscapes and communities, translation and remediation, research and teaching), it examines UK-Scandinavian relations and considers shifting power dynamics between these regions. With its focus on material fragments and its object-based approach, this volume also aims to give a methodological contribution to the study and use – in both research and teaching – of archival materials from university collections.

Ultimately, I firmly believe that the link between research-based education and teaching-based research is a dynamic one that reminds us of the important role that university archives, and access to them, play in the production of culture and dissemination of education.

What does belonging to a community mean to you? 

For me belonging to a community means sharing experiences and practices to support individuals and the community as a whole. Being part of a community is important, but being open to being drawn into different communities is even more important. Had my colleague Dr Annika Lindskog (Lecturer in Swedish and then Admissions Tutor for SELCS) not asked me to contribute to the Y12 Summer School in 2016, I might not have worked so much with WP. Had Andrea not pulled me into the UCL Art Museum in 2016, none of this might have happened and I would not have had the chance to work with so many colleagues from so many different fields. I really like being part of different communities, both in my professional and private life, and ultimately I think it’s when we are open to support and learn from these different communities that the best collaborations and friendships are born.

***

Dr Elletra Carbone is an Associate Professor in Norwegian Studies and Scandinavian Studies in UCL’s School of European Languages, Culture, and Society. Since 2017 Elletra has been Widening Participation and Outreach Tutor for SELCS, and in 2020 Elltra joined the UCL Art Collections Advisory Group. Elletra is also one of the directors of the non-profit publisher Norvik Press Ltd, UCL, a council member of the Anglo-Norse Society, a deputy editor of the journal Scandinavica. An International Journal of Scandinavian Studies and a member of the editorial board of the Journal of European Studies.

All images courtesy of Dr Elettra Carbone.

 

Macarena Jiménez Naranjo promised her student, Nadia Hussain, and the rest of Nadia’s classmates that they would receive full marks for one part of their assessments — simply for turning up to class. Listen to find out how this bold decision lifted the pressure of grades, fostered student-led scholarly exploration, and drew students back into the classroom after the fracturing effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Participants: Mazal Oaknín, Macarena Jiménez Naranjo, and Nadia Hussain (all from UCL’s Department of Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American Studies)

Classrooms are a place for learning, not for play. Teachers teach; students learn.

Actually, Professor Alison Phipps disagrees.

Alison gave an impassioned talk titled “Decolonising Multilingualism: Opacity; Justice; Joy” at Decolonising Language Studies Symposium II—a forum where scholars from a range of disciplines discuss how to decolonise the curriculum in language studies and beyond.

This post is the second part of a series where we summarise speakers’ main ideas from the symposium, which was organised by Dr Jelena Ćalić and Dr Eszter Tarsoly on behalf of PROLang.

Alison, who is Professor of Languages and Intercultural Studies at the University of Glasgow, focused on how learning new languages can be an opportunity for expressions of joy and vulnerability – if classrooms and research settings were rethought to support such emotions.

Put on a show in a new language  

On a course Alison once taught on German popular culture, she told the students that they would have to put on a play at the end of the course in German.

Students, whether studying Marx or feminist theory, eagerly prepared for the final performance through learning how to embody characters from German novels and films.

The pleasure of embodying a character and of coming together to create something was not just highly motivating, but also “great fun.” As Alison tells the story:

“They would raid all the charity shops… and they would dress up, and then they would come and perform. What I discovered they were doing through performing in the language, with the theoretical concepts, dressing up, wearing the lipstick, putting the hair up, all that adrenaline — it meant that they were taking it really seriously, they were wrapping it around, they were clothing their studies.

They were caring for [their studies] in a way that we rarely ask our students to care for their studies… It was a much wider human sense of the work.”

The students did so well that the external examiner suggested that some research should be conducted into the reasons behind their grades. In their oral exams, students talked excitedly about how much fun it was to perform and how regular rehearsal helped to structure their language learning through repetition. Some would even launch into snippets of their performances. Alison sums the experience up as follows:

“It was participatory. The whole class shared it. They really felt it was their work overall.”

Make a fool of yourself  

Another one of Alison’s stories described her volunteer work at a detention centre, where she was recruited to help translate for people housed for deportation.

To her dismay, she realised that “though I was a professor of languages… my languages were useless.” She was “way too fluent in too many colonial languages and European languages… and here I was, sitting in front of people who spoke Pashtu, who spoke Arabic…”

Instead of translating or teaching, Alison found herself becoming a student instead:

“The young guys would teach me to speak their languages and they would be helpless with laughter, because here is a professor of languages who didn’t even know their language existed, and in that moment, there was an equalising… The dignity of language was restored to a group of people utterly stripped of their dignity, and they were laughing at me. I was the learner, and I was stumbling.”

Alison says that part of the work of decolonisation is to “centre the understanding and knowledges of the communities that you are with, and this is a fundamental decolonising move.”

She adds:

“All the things I’d learned about ethnography, and language learning, and performance… is that all of them require you to make a fool of yourself. All of them require you to know nothing. All of them require you to make many, many, many mistakes. A central concept in ethnography is naïveté, the ethnographic naivety: you do not know, you are not an expert, you decentre yourself.

It’s a move that’s vital to interculturality. We are required to decentre ourselves in any intercultural framework to be able to understand from the perspective of others, and so I realised that this decentring might also be useful in the [detention] centre.”

Recognise that language is a gift

Alison recounts other stories, working in places like Ghana or the Gaza Strip where she felt — through experiences of incompetence and inarticulation — how we rely on others to speak for us, or to teach us how to speak.

She says that part of the work of decolonising the curriculum is:

“The attempt by one human being to have a go, to render themselves vulnerable, to laugh at themselves and be laughed at, to stumble through that pronunciation and to be in a place where a new set of relationships might be made and made collectively…

Because there isn’t a word I speak that I haven’t been given by other people, and if I expand that to the context of language learning and language education, then that, my friends, is how I believe we […] find what might be found when we improvise and make things together.”

Alison rounds up her talk by speaking about how she wants to create spaces that are “responsive to dignity, that are fun, and that will allow us collectively to hold that bowl of tears in ways which are safe and ethical and expand a space for joy.”

Alison’s talk was followed by Victoria Odeniyi’s reflections on the challenges and opportunities of embedding research findings into institutional practice: how a university might say things like, “not now, the staff might become confused”, or “this doesn’t align with university policy and standards”, and how we might react to that in turn.

Want to read about Victoria’s presentation? Keep an eye out for the third part of our blog post series, featuring summaries of speakers’ key points, by subscribing to our blog (link on the right) or following us on Twitter.

Watch Alison Phipps’s full talk here.

You can also read an earlier post in the blog series here:

• Let’s re-centre multilingual communities in our classrooms and research: a summary of Prof. Li Wei’s talk

This symposium was organised by Dr Jelena Ćalić and Dr Eszter Tarsoly on behalf of the PROLang (Policy, Research and Outreach for Language-based area studies) Research Group in collaboration with UCL Institute of Advanced Studies, with the support of CHE’s Education Enhancement Grant. This post was written by Kellynn Wee.

In March 2023, the Centre for Humanities Education supported a work-shop on problem-based learning. Problem-based learning is an approach to teaching that has long been used in the fields of law, medicine and STEM. At the outset of a module, students are presented with a real-world problem, case study or scenario from their discipline and work together to find a solution, usually culminating in a final product (report, presentation, exhibition etc.)

Organised by Dr Selena Daly (UCL SELCS) in collaboration with Jesper Hansen (UCL Arena), this workshop showcased how problem-based learning techniques can be applied to the humanities classroom, and featured case studies of modules across the Faculty of Arts and Humanities led by Elettra Carbone (SELCS), Geraldine Horan (SELCS), and Ranjita Dhital (Arts and Sciences).

The workshop held online can be viewed on UCL MediaCentral (01:20:48).