Museums & Collections Blog
  •  
  •  
  • Categories

  •  
  • Tags

  •  
  • Archives

  • Underwhelming Fossil Fish of the Month: July 2015

    By Mark Carnall, on 31 July 2015

    According to Wikipedia, the rule of three is a writing principle that suggests that things that come in three are inherently funnier, more satisfying or more effective than other numbers of things. However, in recent years, scholars have been unearthing a mountain of evidence to suggest that the rule be downgraded to, at best, a rule of thumb, with the more militant scholars going as far to say it should be the curse of three, citing Hobbit films,  the nephews of Donald Duck and Brontë sisters as key evidence. This month’s underwhelming fossil fish was once in three parts but has been stuck together using sticky back plastic and chewing gum expertly and still isn’t very interesting.

    Tentative introduction over, welcome to July’s Underwhelming Fossil Fish of the Month, a monthly foray into the deeply dull and noteunworthy world of fossil fish from the Grant Museum collection. If I were you, I’d recommend going and making yourself a tea or coffee. That’s a much better use of your time.

    Before we get on to this month’s actual underwhelming fossil fish, the box for this month’s specimen is perhaps more interesting as it looks like a bit like a crime scene. The site of an Eldritch ritual by previous museum curators? The soul of this unholy fossiliferous triptych attempting to escape? Flood damage? It’s probably flood damage. Note to curator: replace box.

    Box from hell

    What dark rituals went on here then?

    Here’s what the specimen within looks like.

    Image of LDUCZ NON1486 Tristichopterus alatus fossil from the Grant Museum of Zoology

    LDUCZ-V1558 Tristichopterus alatus note the helpful outline around the fossil and look at those horrible corners.

    It’s not a looker is it? As far as poor taphonomy metaphors go, this fossil fell out of the ugly sedimentary environment and hit every facies on the way to preservation it seems. Unlike other underwhelming fossil fish I’ve featured here that could have really done with it (examples here and here) someone has helpfully scratched/drawn around the fossil just in case you couldn’t locate it. According to the label for this specimen, this is one of D.M.S Watson’s fossil fish. D.M.S Watson was a former curator of the Grant Museum and somewhat of a fossil fishologist extraordinaire. This specimen is identified as Tristichopterus alatus and was collected from the Orkney Islands. Tristichopterus is a Devonian (360-420 million years ago) genus of lobe-finned fish, the group that it is thought evolved into tetrapods, the group that includes amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Because of the close association with our group of animals you would have supposed that this fossil fish may have been more studied than most seeing as we’re inordinately very selfishly interested in where we came from. Unfortunately for Tristichopterus, it has a much sexier relative, Eusthenopteron that normally steals all the ‘look at me I started evolving legs’ thunder, a genus that my colleague Jack Ashby has written about previously on this very blog. Most museum displays and text books telling the story of the evolution of vertebrate life on land will feature a model or fossil of Eusthenopteron, related genera like Tristichopterus often get the short shrift, storing up their jealousy over time, plotting the downfall of the golden genus…

    Preservation Even before the modern museum additions of the scratched outline, sticky labels, paint splatters, actual paint and superglue this specimen wasn’t the prettiest. As regular readers know, I’m a fan of a nicely prepared corner but the bare minimum has been done here to tart this fossil up at all. The specimen has been split into three pieces by mineral veins and crucially the head is missing which most cultures consider the most interesting part of a fish. What is present isn’t preserved in too much detail, some of the skeleton of back of the head are preserved and the fins of the ‘lobe fins’ can be discerned. Unfortunately, not much of the skeleton or the scales can be made out, the softer body parts are preserved here as an amorphous layer of black. Here’s that amorphous structure made even less clear with the ever unreliable and disappointing but reassuringly cheap USB microscope.

    Image of LDUCZ NON1486 Tristichopterus alatus fossil from the Grant Museum of Zoology

    As an impressionist painting, this is quite dark in colour and tone. As a photograph of a specimen under magnification, this is naff.

    Research Initially I found a paltry handful of references about this species as the label for this specimen is Tristicopterus alatus missing an ‘h’. The valid name appears to be Tristichopterus alatus and a fair bit has been published on this species although it’s always in reference to how special and wonderful Eusthenopteron is by comparison. Ooooh the vertebrae in Eusthenopteron as so special (Whiteaves 1883). Eusthenopteron is so precious, lacking parapophyses and ribs on the anterior vertebrae (Garvey, Johanson and Warren 2005). Eusthenopteron is soooo much bigger and better than Tristichopterus (Coates, Ruta and Friedman 2008). Na na na na na! Tristichopterus doesn’t have three axonosts in the pectoral fin (Cope 1887). Eusthenopteron this (Westoll 1943), Eusthenopteron that (Thomson 1967).  We get it. Jeez.

    In Society Have you heard? Eusthenopteron may be dating a leading boyband singer? Eusthenopteron looks amazing in a bikini on holiday in the South of France. Eusthenopteron is to be the new face of <BRAND AND TYPE OF COSMETIC>. Who’s the anonymous beau spotted on the arm of Eusthenopteron leaving <TRENDY LONDON NIGHT SPOT>? Eusthenopteron rumoured to be next child of William and Kate….

    Tristochopterus alatus

    Preservation 5
    Research 3.5
    Society 0
    Underwhelmingness 8.7

    References

    Coates, M, I., Ruta, M and Friedman, M. 2008. Ever since Owen: Changing Perspectives on the Early Evolution of Tetrapods. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Vol. 39, pp. 571-592

    Cope, E.D. 1887. Zittel’s Manual of Palaeontology. General Notes. Geology and Palaeontology. The American Naturalists. University of Chicago Press. Vol. 21, No. 11 (Nov., 1887) , pp. 1014-1020

    Garvey, J.M., Johanson, Z and Warren, A. 2005. Redescription of the Pectoral Fin and Vertebral Column of the Rhizodontid Fish Barameda decipiens from the Lower Carboniferous of Australia. Journal of Vertebrate Palaeontology. Vol. 25, No. 1 (Mar. 11, 2005) , pp. 8-18.

    Thomson, K.S. 1967. Notes on the Relationships of the Rhipidistian Fishes and the Ancestry of the Tetrapods. Journal of Paleontology. Vol. 41, No. 3 (May, 1967) , pp. 660-673

    Westoll, T.S. 1943. The Hyomandibular of Eusthenopteron and the Tetrapod Middle Ear. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. Vol. 131, No. 865 (Nov. 2, 1943) , pp. 393-414

    Whiteaves, J.F. 1883. Recent Discoveries of Fossil Fishes in the Devonian Rocks of Canada. The American Naturalist. University of Chicago Press. Vol. 17, No. 2 (Feb., 1883) , pp. 158-164.

    Mark Carnall is the Curator of the Grant Museum of Zoology

    3 Responses to “Underwhelming Fossil Fish of the Month: July 2015”

    • 1
      Helen Chavez wrote on 31 July 2015:

      Actually, I found the fish quite lively in a fossily sort of way. But the box … it has that inherent aura of face-huggerishness, a menacing, gelatinous mass with a hint of blobby Lovecraftian otherworldliness. There is almost a 3D effect to it. A doorway to another universe, where Pink Matter reigns supreme. Yes indeed.

    • 2
      Mark Carnall wrote on 31 July 2015:

      Don’t think about the box too hard Helen, lest the forces of darkness overcome your psyche.

    • 3
      Underwhelming Fossil Fish of the Month: August 2015 | UCL Museums & Collections Blog wrote on 28 August 2015:

      […] much can be made out from this specimen aside from the odd spine which can be discerned. Like last month’s underwhelming fossil fish this specimen is mostly an amorphous layer of black preserved in a suspiciously fish-shaped […]

    Leave a Reply