Post-election stalling in Ulaanbaatar: The case of Building No. 3
By ucsarpl, on 16 September 2016
This blog is the fifth in a series of posts about Mongolia’s 2016 parliamentary elections that were held on June 29th.
Mongolia’s June 29th national parliamentary elections and Ulaanbaatar city elections acted as a multifaceted anticipatory device. The elections could be said to form a symbolically cumulative conclusion to a troubled political and economic period. The result was a vast overhaul of the state hural and the winning of an 85.5% majority for the Mongolian People’s Party (MPP). However, looking deeper into the temporal flow of the pre-election and post-election period reveals not so much a culminating electoral event and political regime change at the national and city levels. Instead, for many people living in Ulaanbaatar, this year has proven to be one of ongoing waiting and uncertainty. This period has been punctuated by waves of speculation and markers in time that produce stalling caused by changing groups of the political class.
The materiality of stalling
For many people living in Ulaanbaatar, this stalling has had considerable material repercussions that began well before the elections. One local official told me that the providing of certificates of temporary possession (ezemshih gerchilgee) of newly acquired pieces of land was stalled on the 25th of May 2016 in the lead-up to the election. People claiming new land in the north of the city were attempting several times a week to try and process the right paperwork, but were consistently sent away to return ‘after the election.’ However, now almost three months afterwards, the processing of new land has not yet recommenced. In this period of bureaucratic stalling, people attempt to chase the right land official who visits on particular days, but are told that the land official is only currently dealing with ‘problem land’ and not new applications. However, to the average person, what counts bureaucratically as ‘problem land’ is opaque and not fully knowable. The fact is that many people in new plots of land are in varying forms of conflict with their neighbours as to the limits of boundary fences. Instead of waiting for bureaucratic decisions to be made in the meantime, people go ahead and secure their land in other ways. For instance, they may stay on the land in an effort to hold it, and attempt to secure it with a fence before it can be officially recognised.[i]
Waiting amongst disrepair
One group of people in Ulaanbaatar have been particularly hit by post-election stalling. Again, their story began a long time before this year’s elections. They are a people who have been left behind after the last economic peak of 2011 and have borne the brunt of the subsequent departure of major investment from Ulaanbaatar’s construction sector. In the heart of Zuun Ail, an area close to the city core and a prime area for redevelopment projects, lies a collection of old niitiin bair – former construction worker dormitories built during the 1950s. Building No. 3, like the other niitiin bair, stands as a two story building that consists of one room apartments. These buildings have never had running water, and residents obtain their water from nearby wells. The one advantage these buildings had was heating. In the earlier days of the rise in construction development a construction company sought to redevelop these buildings into apartments. Excited at the prospects of gaining access to better infrastructure including running water, and increasing the value of their property, many owners in Building No. 3 signed contracts with the company to exchange their apartments for new ones to be built in their place.
Unfortunately, funding dried up, the redevelopment of Building No. 3 did not go ahead and the construction company is rumoured to have gone bankrupt.[ii] Before this was known however, the internal infrastructure of several of the rooms were removed, including the heating pipes, windows, doors and floor boards which were sold for scrap. Several different parties are blamed for this, including some residents claiming that owners were told to remove the infrastructure to display intent to leave and compliance with the upcoming redevelopment. Since then, the rooms have been further vandalised. The end result has been that multiple apartments on the bottom floor of the building have been slowly filled with refuse, as rubbish has been routinely disposed of through the gaping holes of former windows over the course of some time. The building’s heating has been switched off, the building itself is in a crumbling state of disrepair and is unsafe to live in.
Several people still live in this building and are unable to leave. Many owners, both living in the building and elsewhere, are desperate to find a solution to their problem – to find a different construction company deal, to receive compensation from the original construction company, or to simply find alternative housing. However, since the election period, simply being provided emergency alternative housing has become a main and urgent aim. Those still living in the apartment are working to a strict and unforgiving deadline: the looming onset of winter in an unsafe apartment building without heating. The situation is dire and resulted in Amnesty International Mongolia putting a call out to campaign for the former Ulaanbaatar mayor Bat-Üül to provide these people with alternative housing. This Amnesty International call-out has since been renewed and rebroadcasted since the elections. During the elections, election promises were made offering some solutions. This has meant that for these people, the elections acted as an important anticipatory device. However, as yet, the residents have not yet been provided alternative housing and cold weather is fast approaching.
Cleaning in defiance
For the resident owners, this prolonged period of waiting has been a time of strategy, observation and flows of different types of actions. Just as the political stalling is prolonged and ongoing, so too are their different types of strategies. Here attempted ‘resolution’ of their situation, rather than an end point, is a maintaining device and important way to be heard. Residents have been involved in different court cases related to their situation. Much time is spent commenting on the ongoing situation while sitting in doorways of buildings and on the street, where updates are shared, compared and critiqued. They display an ‘active interaction’ between resistance and attempts to bring about change, while staving off the material flow-on effects of forced disrepair (Ortner 2016).
This was clearly seen on May 22nd 2016, when several residents spent a full day clearing all the rubbish out of the empty apartment rooms on the ground floor. This was a huge undertaking. The rubbish was putrid and some of it had even decayed to earth. This rubbish had been an invasion of their building, encroaching closely on their own small apartment rooms. Who had deposited this rubbish and what it actually consisted of was essentially unknowable. By cleaning it up, they were moving against the anonymity of an accumulation of urban waste disposal over a long period of time. They were rejecting the slow deterioration and destruction of their living space that had occurred through quests for bountiful profit for some, and a better quality of life for others:
Thanks to their amazing efforts, the rooms are now cleared. But the building’s current residents continue to wait. They plan to have everyone move upstairs, then seal off the corridors and the windows of the ground floor to stop further rubbish polluting their building. In this period of waiting, their only option is to carve out a better space and modify this building to their needs. However, in the last few weeks, residents have informed me that people are beginning again to throw rubbish into the building during the night.
Stalling in a far-from-normal election year
The promise of varying forms of assistance for residents of Building No. 3 is an election promise of severe personal, emotional weight. Providing emergency alternative housing can determine the health and well-being of a large group of people this coming winter. While some steps by new politicians have been taken since the election, alternative housing has yet to be confirmed. The failure to provide such housing puts these people into a dire and unknowable situation and has considerable material and felt ramifications.
Bureaucratic stalling in Ulaanbaatar at the height of summer was always going to have significant effects reverberating throughout the city. A land official told me, “it is normal for this [kind of stalling] to happen during an election year.” It is common for a new term of Mongolian national parliament to not be confirmed until September of that year. However, as Mongolia’s new politicians are aware, Mongolia’s recent economic oscillations mean that this year is no ‘normal’ election year. To address the looming decisions, the new state parliament was formed much quicker than usual.
What was described as a crisis in the lead up to the election has transformed to ever deepening gradations of ‘crisis levels’ without a clear end in sight. The course that Mongolia now needs to take given the government’s own economic assessment is by no means clear. Mongolia faces major economic decisions that, no matter which way they turn, will have significant geopolitical consequences. Mongolia is currently considering accepting IMF bailouts, while the Bank of China has set up an office in Ulaanbaatar, and waits to see whether Mongolia will open its economic borders to allow it to set up branches and commence operations in Mongolia.
While bureaucratic stalling is common during an election year, acts of stalling this year are especially critical given the far-reaching economic fallout that has affected so many groups of people. However, where there is stalling, there are also new possibilities. While people wait to see whether this ‘crisis ordinary’ (Berlant 2011:10 c.f. Rebecca Empson this blog series) will deepen into a chasm of economic disrepair that the country as yet cannot see an end to, some people see this interlude as the opportunity to divert their current course. Let’s just hope that the new political representatives of Zuun Ail at the city and national level will find ways to manoeuvre their newly acquired power to allow the residents of Building No. 3 to access alternative housing this winter. These are one group of people who simply cannot afford to wait.
For more information on Amnesty International’s campaign for this case, please see: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa30/4793/2016/en/
© All photos by Rebekah Plueckhahn
A sincere thank you to Doljinsuren and Erdenezayar for assistance with this research.
[i] Living on land as a way to ‘hold’ and prevent others from claiming it has long been a part of land access in Ulaanbaatar since 1990.
[ii] While conducting research on property in Ulaanbaatar, more stories emerged of other similar failed redevelopments of other buildings in different areas of the city.
27 Responses to “Post-election stalling in Ulaanbaatar: The case of Building No. 3”
Rebekah Plueckhahn wrote on 19 September 2016:
Thanks for your comment Rebecca. Yes, it is interesting trying to unravel peoples perceptions of the differences between complicated processes and the need to wait, vs actual, deliberate stalling. It is often unclear. In the case of land bureaucracy, in the lead up to the election, what was already a complicated process of acquiring possession of land has indeed been deliberately stopped for a lengthy period of time in areas of the city. People trying to secure land are aware of this stalling but perhaps also see it as another extension to an already lengthy process.
For the people in Building No. 3 it is a bit more unclear. I think the owners/residents continually deal with an oscillation between two things: 1) just what you described, a complicated process that they hope will be resolved eventually, 2) which is punctuated by news and meetings with people, where answers, responses and decisions are being delayed and the situation has not be resolved. Also, people expressed to me that they feel that this years big events – the election, ASEM and Naadam – would only delay or ‘stall’ a response to this ongoing process.
Majortotosite Top wrote on 11 March 2023:
I must tell you this is an excellent post. 먹튀검증
Betsarang Com wrote on 11 March 2023:
This is wonderful website to find blogs on various topics. 스포츠토토
Oncasinosite Net wrote on 11 March 2023:
Really liked your work and has been following it for a long time now. 바카라
Totopick Pro wrote on 11 March 2023:
This piece of writing posted at this site is truly good. 토토사이트
anna wrote on 27 March 2023:
Although name write my cause and effect essay https://essaysforme.com/write-my-cause-and-effect-essay suggests that both causes and effects are examined, students often have to choose on which factors to focus most. The choice depends on topic and your own preferences unless task has already been provided by teacher. If your professor likes to provide students with freedom of choice when it comes to topics, we have some good cause and effect essay topics you can use right now.
slotsiteinfo wrote on 10 April 2023:
That’s what I love about your content. You have pour out your heart on it. https://www.slotsite.info/
casinositesafecom wrote on 10 April 2023:
This is indeed an interesting read. I love sharing the content I receive here, so much good information. https://www.casinositesafe.com/
totositenetcom wrote on 10 April 2023:
Great post I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this interesting and knowledgeable article. https://www.totositenet.com/
totositesafecom wrote on 10 April 2023:
A good blog always comes-up with new and exciting information and while reading I have feel that this blog is really have all those quality that qualify a blog to be a one https://www.totositesafe.com/
Alexandria DUI Lawyer Virginia wrote on 18 April 2023:
Nice informative content. Thanks for sharing this beautiful post. Keep sharing more blogs. Alexandria DUI Lawyer Virginia
Mushtaq wrote on 23 April 2023:
Mushtaq brings you the best new designer dresses online in Pakistan. Explore the variety of the latest designer dresses online and get your favorite dresses in all over Pakistan at affordable prices.
Ammara khan wrote on 27 April 2023:
Are you looking for the latest embroidered dress online in Pakistan? So, come to Ammara khan online and get the latest embroidered dresses online in all over Pakistan at reasonable prices with quick delivery.
Husaro wrote on 28 April 2023:
Thanks for this wonderful information on this site. AIM Provider Portal
poppy mizzi wrote on 5 May 2023:
Your posts are very detailed and meticulous, hope that next time you will have more good articles to share with readers. If you have more time, please visit: backrooms
toto365pro wrote on 7 May 2023:
It’s always helpful to read through content from
other authors and practice something from other sites. 스포츠토토
sportstototvcom wrote on 7 May 2023:
nice post. You’ll learn something completely new and rewarding on the sites you come across every day. 토토
betmantotoorg wrote on 7 May 2023:
Your way of explaining everything in this paragraph is actually great.
All easy to know it, thank you very much. 스포츠토토
slotmachinesitecom wrote on 7 May 2023:
Hello, this is my first time on this site.
The posts have actually been fruitful in my favor, please keep posting these types of articles. 바다이야기
melissa11 wrote on 15 May 2023:
Remember that the specific steps may vary slightly depending on the Bitcoin https://satoshihero.com/ you choose. Always read and follow the instructions provided by the games itself for the best experience.
ทางเข้าเล่น igoal wrote on 23 May 2023:
There is so much information and so many things to learn in this blog.
ตัวแทนจำหน่าย myst labs wrote on 26 May 2023:
I love reading your web site. Fantastic blog article. Really thank you!
ตัวแทนจำหน่าย myst labs
ตัวแทนจำหน่าย myst labs wrote on 26 May 2023:
This is an amazing Blog and very informative and useful Thanks.
ตัวแทนจำหน่าย myst labs
Thanks so much for this great post. I wonder if you could elaborate on what is considered actual ‘stalling’ (without anyone attending to something, and perhaps deliberately so), and what may be perceived as just a slow bureaucratic process that is complicated but will eventually be resolved? I ask because the practice of waiting is such a culturally- defined experience (ordered queues, collective petitions, individual bribes, feigning lack of interest in an outcome etc.).