Professor Kuriyama Q & A – Part IV By thea.vidnes, on 3 April 2009 [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxhY2UrEeQM] Posted by Thea Vidnes One Response to “Professor Kuriyama Q & A – Part IV” 1 Mike Stanley-Baker wrote on 26 April 2009: Summary of Content: 0:03 On Baby Bob, and a different kind of audience attention. 3:39 How can modern media techniques be harness and transformed effectively in current academic life? 5:24 Is there a difference between undergraduate and postgraduate presentations? 6:32 How can media presentation compete with written texts (e.g. essays) in terms of academic rigour and apparatus (e.g. footnotes?) 8:42 Does Professor Kuriyama require his students to submit a copy of the script alongside submission of the media presentations? 9:37 Are there particular difficulties trying to assess different types of media presentations for the same assignment, e.g. podcasts vs. film clip? Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required)
Summary of Content:
0:03 On Baby Bob, and a different kind of audience attention.
3:39 How can modern media techniques be harness and transformed effectively in current academic life?
5:24 Is there a difference between undergraduate and postgraduate presentations?
6:32 How can media presentation compete with written texts (e.g. essays) in terms of academic rigour and apparatus (e.g. footnotes?)
8:42 Does Professor Kuriyama require his students to submit a copy of the script alongside submission of the media presentations?
9:37 Are there particular difficulties trying to assess different types of media presentations for the same assignment, e.g. podcasts vs. film clip?