Social media, social distance, and inconsistency
By Razvan Nicolescu, on 22 January 2014
This post is about what people in the Italian fieldsite feel their peers should not do on social media.
Here is a fragment from an interview with a 18 year old student on an issue that was mentioned in different ways by most of the teenagers I talked to:
‘What I don’t like [about Facebook] is… these guys who pretend [on Facebook] they are completely different than how they really are [in realtà]. For example, there are some who [at school] don’t talk to anybody, they are all alone (…) and on Facebook they talk a lot, they talk a lot about themselves, how nice they are, they friend up with many people, they ‘Like’ so many things (…) and in reality they don’t even say ‘hello’… there is this girl, she just passes along without saying anything to you…’
These teenagers are not necessarily complaining about either of these two contrasting attitudes of the person, but rather the difference between the two attitudes. Most of the teenagers I talked to think that the most annoying issues they are exposed to on social media are related to a sort of inconsistency between online and offline presence. They seem to not mind if some of their peers are distant or not very social offline, and not even if some are ‘over-social’ and extremely creative online; rather, they sense an inadequacy whenever they see contrasting behaviours in each of the two worlds, that are not justified or explained somehow. At the same time, the attitude of some teenagers and young people to refuse joining any social media seems to be accepted and sometimes even appreciated.
To give this discussion more context, it is important to note that among teenagers and young people in the Italian fieldsite, Facebook is by far the most used social networking site and WhatsApp is by far the most used mobile app. The two platforms rather complete each other: young people think Facebook is a more resilient tool to present oneself and to communicate with a larger set of peers, while WhatsApp is thought as being appropriate for more transient communication within smaller and more intimate peer-groups such as family and close friends. Additionally, there are several other Internet sites and applications which provide these platforms with multimedia content, most notably YouTube and online photo editors such as PicMonkey, iPiccy, or piZap.
The quote above expresses the common thought that people should be true to their peers on social media, or at least not confuse them too much. But it is also true that teenagers expect confusion and excitement on social media. But they feel that this kind of confusion should come from people who also adopt these attitudes in the classroom or on the streets. Most of the users of social media explore the myriad of options available online and their own creativity in order to strengthen various parts of their personalities. Very often social media is not an extension, but an enabler, or a way of promoting the self that is considered acceptable in each particular community. This is the reason why, for example, when a couple breaks up the most violent manifestations are happening online rather than offline. By removing an ex-lover from the list of online friends and thoroughly reconsidering each of their mutual friends one has to objectify the split in ways that in the offline world are considered either unnecessary or ‘natural’. In another post I will write about the effort people put in translating the ‘natural’, and what this means, into the online environment. For now, my point is simply that while on one hand this process is admired in different ways, on the other, people who appear online in ways that seem to have no equivalent or justification in the offline word are highly sanctioned.
This also represents a critique to the sort of literature and public discourses that judge changes brought by social media in terms of fundamental shifts from a pre-existing cultural logic. This kind of discourse was repeated in different ways for the advent of mobile telephony, the Internet, web-based applications and services, and indeed for describing other similar ‘revolutions’ such as the invention of the printing press, modern public transportation, or television. At least from this ethnography it seems that people just do not fit too easy into this model.
9 Responses to “Social media, social distance, and inconsistency”
EllaTasm wrote on 22 January 2014:
Open and talkative online; quiet and shy offline: this is beginning to look like a pattern http://t.co/5QQP8AQ6Bq
Gabriel Navarro wrote on 22 January 2014:
Gabriel Navarro liked this on Facebook.
darkheartfelt wrote on 22 January 2014:
Study: Young social media users abhor disingenuousness online http://t.co/F2qYq1AAhG
Marjorie Murray wrote on 22 January 2014:
Marjorie Murray liked this on Facebook.
AgroFeedHunter wrote on 22 January 2014:
Altra interessante indagine di @UCLSocNet sui teenager italiani e differenze tra loro comportamento online e offline http://t.co/z6ee13uD0v
Fiachra Barry wrote on 23 January 2014:
Fiachra Barry liked this on Facebook.
LondonLucre wrote on 23 January 2014:
“on Facebook they talk a lot, they talk a lot about themselves .. and in reality they don’t even say ‘hello’”
UCL Global Social Media Impact Study wrote on 23 January 2014:
UCL Global Social Media Impact Study liked this on Facebook.
Italian teens, social media and identity or what people feel their peers should not do on social media http://t.co/5QQP8AQ6Bq