X Close

Global Social Media Impact Study


Project Blog


‘Big data’ or ‘Data with a soul’?

By Xin Yuan Wang, on 8 November 2012

Image: Thegreenfly (Creative Commons)

What is big data? In the digital era, the data produced by people on an everyday basis is myriad. There is always more data coming into being, and it is growing at an unimaginable rate. People believe that big data will lead to big impact, claiming that big data opens the door to a new approach to understanding people and helps to making decisions. At the 2012 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, big data was a theme topic and the report Big Data, Big Impact by the forum claimed that big data should be considered as a new class of economic asset, like currency or gold. People who are masters at harnessing the big data of the Web (online searches, posts and messages) with Internet advertising stand to make a big fortune.

I love data, so big data sounds brilliant! However I am not a ‘big fan’ of big data. Partly because, for me, big data sounds more like a marketing term rather than analytical tool; partly because, being trained as an anthropologist, I am very cautious about going too far out on a limb to make such assumptions. For me, it will be a great pity to see people who fancy formulating big data with brilliant statistics, however ignoring the little stories happen in daily life which have been taken for granted

For anthropology, to some extent story is the date with a soul, or contextualized data to be exact. There is always a danger that data without a context would be confusing and very misleading. For example, in my previous study on the appropriation of Facebook among Taiwanese students in the UK, one thing I discovered is that the Taiwanese use the function ‘like’ on Facebook much more frequently compared to UK Facebook users. For a Taiwanese who have 150-200 friends on Facebook, 20-50 ‘likes’ for each status or posting is very commonplace, and the average amount of ‘like’s’ which people give to others is 15-35 daily. Such considerable amount of ‘likes’, per se, could possibly lead me to making some superficial conclusions, for example, that Taiwanese are more predisposed to admire others online, so on and so forth. However, it was only after long-term participant-observation and several in-depth discussions with each of my informants, that I start to realize that both the Chinese normativity of proper social reaction (save face, reciprocity, renqing) and moral responsibility taken by individuals in the negotiation of real life communication practices shape the pattern of Taiwanese online performance.

 “For most of the time I ‘like’ people because I have nothing to say about their updates, but I want them to know that I care about them, I follow their lives.”

“Liking is polite, just like saying hello when you meet your friends. Nothing to do with the content which you like.”

“…I kind of think that, the more I like a certain person, the less I want to be really involved into his/her real life. ‘Like’ is easy and safe. You know you still need to give a face to people.”

Also, according to the principle of Chinese “Bao” (reciprocity), people who have been ‘liked’, will try to find all the means to pay off debts of the “Renqing” (favor) to others.

“I would expect ‘likes’ from others on Facebook, you know, which makes me more engaged with them and I will like their posts as often as I can. For those who like or leave comments on my profile, I will reply to them with careful preparation to show my sincerity.” as the other key informant said.

It’s so interesting to explore the ways in which “Being Chinese” and Facebook appropriation have been mutually constituted. Facebook is to some extent re-invented by the Taiwanese. If I just count how many ‘likes’ and analyze it without looking into the online content and offline context, I will miss the point no matter how big and sophisticated the data is.

So, the question is whether we are looking at ‘big data’ or ‘data with a soul’? Of course, these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive to each other, even though there are some things you can only do with Big Data or ethnographic data. The point is how can we take advantage of the best parts of the both and contribute to the understanding of our human society as a whole, which is also a big question mark for all the researchers in the digital age.

5 Responses to “‘Big data’ or ‘Data with a soul’?”

  • 1
    Marie Taillard wrote on 11 November 2012:

    I liked your post. I too am interested in looking at big data from a more human perspective, and particularly adopting a more creative approach to it. I agree that the analytical and human approaches are in fact compatible and that it is up to us, social scientists to show the way. This is what my colleagues and I are doing by advocating a more creative and qualitative approach to big data — we had a recent conference on the topic, and you might find some of our posts interesting — feel free to get in touch to discuss further.

  • 2
    Xin Yuan Wang wrote on 12 November 2012:

    Hi Marie Thanks for your post. It seems we share some research interests! We are just starting our own project which aims to add a lot of new understanding to the theme you mentioned. Also the website over at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/social-networking/projects shows a list of some recent projects on social networking, and you might also find some of our projects interesting.
    All the best!

  • 3
    Marcus wrote on 12 November 2012:

    this concept of big data is fascinating, but it does not deal with two issues: (i) how much of the data is useless “noise” (as most data linked to the trading of stocks, FX, commodities, etc) and (ii) how to convert the data not only into targetted marketing but how to convert data into targetted shopping. A real analysis of each buck spent on targetted marketing all facebook users are subject to might conclude that it is all or largely wasted money – and hence big data was useless. As you said, it’s easy to click the “like” button, even if you dislike something.

  • 4
    Xin Yuan Wang wrote on 12 November 2012:

    Hi Marcus, Thanks a lot for your post! and your insider’s opinion on the problematic issues about big data is well taken.

  • 5
    Big Data Analytics Training in Pune wrote on 19 September 2018:

    thanks for sharing …..good information