Englefield House, Berkshire


Englefield House, Berkshire – Home to the Benyon family

 Englefield House, Berkshire

Processes and Practices

by Kate Smith


Please note that this case study was first published on blogs.ucl.ac.uk/eicah in March 2013. It was last check by the project team on 19 August 2014. For citation advice, visit ‘Using the website’.

Read case study as PDF

The eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century history of Englefield House, particularly its connections with the East India Company in this period, remain largely hidden. There is no sign of the East India Company and its Indian ventures on the exterior of the building. There is no published record of individuals visiting Englefield and noting its East India Company connections. Nevertheless objects, people and wealth all linked Englefield House to the East India Company in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century. Using correspondence, wills, inventories and objects this case study reveals how such connections shaped Englefield in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century.

Rather than treating Englefield as an inert object, this case study examines the country house as a series of processes to uncover the histories that are seemingly absent from Englefield’s exterior. Building on Mark Girouard’s contextual approach to country house history, it particularly focuses on the movement of people, objects and money into and through this house and explores the different processes that prompted such movement. [1] Marriage, inheritance and renting ensured that new people unconnected with the original Englefield family entered and occupied Englefield House in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century. For a longer introduction to the central arguments in this case study – click here.

PART I: The Movement of People

Richard Benyon, Lady Margaret Clive and Elizabeth Sykes were all connected to the East India Company and came to reside at Englefield House at different points during the eighteenth century. Richard Benyon worked for the Company, Lady Margaret Clive was effectively married to the Company and Elizabeth Sykes was daughter to a Company man. This section of the case study tracks how such individuals came to inhabit Englefield House.

EIC arms

The East India Company Arrives (1745-1776)

In 1745 the widow Mary Wrighte married Richard Benyon of Gidea Hall, Essex. In doing so she began Englefield’s long connection to the East India Company. This section explores Richard Benyon’s early life and questions how and why he came to be reisdent at Englefield House in the mid-eighteenth century.



The Wrightes Return (1770s)

When Mary Benyon died in 1776, Englefield passed to Paulet Wrighte the Younger. While in possession of the house, Wrighte made many changes to the interior and exterior of Englefield House. In making these changes, however, Wrighte incurred debts, which had important consequences for the next owner.


PORTRAIT OF MARGARET MASKELYNE, LADY CLIVE, by Nathanial Dance, at Powis Castle, Powys, Wales

Lady Margaret Clive at Englefield House (1780s)

In the 1780s Englefield House required a tenant. Lady Margaret Clive took up residence in 1782. Although we know little of the objects Lady Clive brought to Englefield, correspondence provides evidence of the people she invited there.



Englefield Constable

 The Benyon Legacy (1796-1854)

When Richard Benyon’s grandson Richard Benyon, inherited Englefield in 1796 the house began to be shaped by another generation of Benyons. This section explores the changes Benyon made and the legacy he established.



PART II: The Movement of Things

By the early decades of the eighteenth century luxury Asian objects, such as porcelain, lacquerware and silks, had become an important part of the British country house interior. Such wares were generally brought into Britain along trade routes travelled by the European East India Companies. This part of the case study examines the movement of such objects into the interiors of Englefield and questions how personal objects brought back by individual East India Company officials were differentiated from other luxury Asian objects brought in by the Company. It asks what did these objects mean to the families who transported and owned them?

2006AK4742_jpg_dsGlobal Goods at Englefield House

An inventory survives for Englefield House for 1741, four years before Richard Benyon entered it. Compiled by a certain Richard Chillingworth, the inventory depicts a house filled with luxury global objects – Turkey carpets, japanned dressing boxes and ‘India’ pictures. How did this house come to contain such objects?



Handkerchief V&A-2Material Knowledge

As an East India Company official working in Madras, Richard Benyon knew about textiles. He came to use that knowledge not only in his work but also in his personal life when sending gifts and mementoes. Through the deployment of detailed material knowledge Benyon was able to express affection and regard to distant relations. For Benyon, objects were important things.



ai_table2Inheriting India

Both Mary and Richard Benyon understood how objects could be used to strengthen familial ties across space and time. In bequeathing Indian objects to her son, Mary not only expressed affection through the transmission of valuable commodities, however,  she also created a connection between her son and the East India Company. Such objects provided a material record of the family’s history.



>>> Read case study as PDF

>>> Timeline for Englefield House


The text and research for this case study was primarily authored by Kate Smith.


On 29 September 2013, John C. left the following comment on this page:

Kate, I have doing a fair bit of research on the Benyon family of Englefield. Burke’s “Landed Gentry ” (1855 p.76) records the family as follows:
“BENYON OF ENGLEFIELD, BERKSHIRE. LINEAGE: Richard Benyon esq, Governor of Fort St George, in the east Indies, son of Daniel Benyon esq. By Mary his wife, b 26 Nov 1698 married for his third wife Mary, dau of Francis Tysson Esq of Baines House, Hackney, and relicit of Powlett Wright Esq (grandson of Sir Nathaniel Wright, Lord Keeper of the Privy Seal), and had one son, RICHARD BENYON (b1745, d 1796)…”
The Debeauvoir Association, which is sponsored by the Benyon Estate at Englefield, has carried a number of historical articles on the family including (Article in DeBeauvoir Association Newsletter July 2008 p4. http://www.debeauvoir.org.uk):
“So how did Richard Benyon (de Beauvoir) pop out of the woodwork? His early 17th century ancestor Gabriel Benyon of Crooked Lane, son of a Warwickshire yeoman who suppled candles to the Balmes Estate when it was owned by the Whitmores. Benyon’s orphaned grandfather, another Richard Benyon, was shipped out to the East Indies trading post at Madras at the age of 9 by Colonel John Perry (his godfather), the rather shady secretary to the slave-trading Royal Africa Company. Perry took a bond on this first Richard Benyon for 500 pds and in Madras, Benyon was taken up and adopted by the Beauvoir family in all but name. He eventually married into the family to save the Estate at Englefield from the Tory Catholics.”
Daniel Benyon (1664-c1709), Richard’s father was christened 12/8/1664 at St Nicholas Acons, London to Daniel Benyon Snr (c1628-1690), tallow chandler of Crooked Lane, and Mary, his wife. Not much is known about him. According to Burke, he married a Mary and their son was Richard (born 26 Nov 1698). Richard had an older brother (or possibly an uncle) Bernard Benyon (c 1685-1715) who also moved to India with him in 1711 and died at Fort St George, Madras in 1715. Daniel Benyon was probably a merchant, and appears to have been based in Madras, India in 1701-2. He died before 1709 when his son Richard, then an orphan, was sent to Madras.
It is possible that Burke has the name of Daniel Benyon’s wife wrong, and that it was Elizabeth rather than Mary. A Daniel Bynian from Deptford, Blackheath, Kent was buried at St Margaret Lee Kent on 27/5/1708, followed by his widow Elizabeth on 19/10/1709, and daughter Elizabeth (29/7/1709). Daniel Benyon married Elizabeth Moore in April 1691. They also had a son George christened at St Alfege, Greenwich (10/5/1692), on whose baptism certificate he is described as a ‘merchant’. Indeed, it is also possible that he married twice, and that Bernard was the son of an earlier marriage. Bernard Benyon married around 1710 to Grace and had two children at Fort St George, Madras: Edward (13/2/1712, who returned to work in Madras in 1733) and Grace (30/6/1713).

Daniel Benyon was the son of another Daniel Benyon and is recorded in Boyd’s Citizens of London as married to a Mary and having three children between 1660 and 1664: Mary (Benyen) 15/9/1660, Daniell (Binnion) 12/8/1664 and a third unnamed child who was buried 30 Mar 1663. Daniel Benyon was buried at St Dunstans & All Saints on 19/4/1690 with the reference “of Wapping to St Nicholas Acons”. St Nicholas Acons is just 200m from the address given by Daniel Benyon in 1652 of ‘St Michaels Crooked Lane’ and 600m from the church where his brother Gabriel was baptised in 1619.

Daniel Benyon was born c1628 and, like his father Gabriel , trained as a tallow chandler. He is listed as accepting an apprentice (John Harrison, son of Richard, citizen and stationer) on 20 Jan 1663/4, and later served as Master of the Company of Tallow Chandlers in 1689. Daniel Benyon is mentioned in 1671 in Chancery Proceedings when his nephew Benjamin Benyon sued him over the estate of his father Gabriel Benyon. Gabriel Benyon’s’s will (PCC 1662) lists two sons: Daniel and Robert, and Robert’s son Benjamin, as well as his wife Susanna. Benjamin was probably born about 1657, as Benjamin Benyon, ‘son of Robert citizen and apothecary’ was apprenticed to Richard Joyce a tallow chandler in Mar/1671.
Gabriel was the executor of his brother in law JohnCarter’s will in 1664. john Carter was an ancestor of a famous American family that includes the two US Presidents Harrison.

Gabriel Benyon was the youngest of the three sons of Thomas Benyon of Berkeswell, WArwickshire (will PCC 1608) and his wife Isabell Higginson. Thomas was the son of THomas Benion (d 1543) and his wife Margery Cotton, of Stoneleigh, Warwickshire. Both Thomas and Margery came from old Shropshire families based near Whitchurch.

I have more if you are interested.

The Benyon family was close to the notorious (and eventually very wealthy) Thomas Pitt (1653-1726), son of a Dorset parson who was Governor of Fort St George from 1698-1709, having been a merchant in India since 1674. He later served in the House of Commons and was the grandfather of William Pitt the Elder Prime Minister from 1766-68, and great grandfather of William Pitt the Younger, Prime Minister 1783-1801; 1804-06. Thomas Pitt is known as “Diamond Pitt” because of his purchase and profit from an extraordinary diamond, which was eventually sold to Phillippe II, Duke of Orleans for 135,000 pds and is now part of the French Crown jewels. Daniel Benyon, a ‘dear friend’ of Thomas Pitt, was part of the negotiations that lead to the purchase of the diamond. In a letter, Pitt recorded the circumstances of the purchase at Madras in 1701-02: “Mr Benyon was then writing in my closet, with whom I discoursed on what had passed and told him now I was clear of it; when about an hour after my servant brought me word that Jamchund and Vincatee Chittee were at the door……Presently he came to 48,000 pagodas, when I went again into the closet to Mr Benyon and told him what had passed: so I closed with him got that sum.” A footnote notes that “Mr Benyon” was “Daniel Benyon, father of Richard Benyon, Governor of Fort St George, and great grandfather of the late Richard Benyon of Englefield, Berks.”. In October 1709, shortly before he left Madras, Pitt sent a consignment of goods to London on the :Henry Davenport” consigned to ‘Bernard Benyon, merchant of London’, who had presumably taken over his father’s affairs after his death. Following Bernard’s death in 1715, Pitt wrote to his son that he had received news from Madras that ‘poor Benyon and Mr Fleetwood are dead’ and adds ‘In the former I have a great loss.”

On 30 September, Kate Smith left the following reply for John C.,

Dear John,

Many thanks for getting in touch. This is really interesting and useful information about the formation of the Benyon family in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth century. It gives me a much clearer idea of the networks from which Richard Benyon emerged. Thanks again!!

All best,